Perhaps we can work together to analyze this and select the best possible new word, acronym, or short phrase (etc) for the concept of Wwenemy? Perhaps we can publish this as a group? As a group maybe we can work together to make sure the publication is well written and quit relying on me to try to do that myself? The publication could include the best word, phrase, acronym, etc. that we select, an overall short definition we discuss, and, also, the personalized definitions submitted by people who want to contribute their interpretation of the definition (with or without their names, as per their wishes)? One of the goals of Solution Seeking is to present full range discussions of all solutions, so why not do something similar with the new definitions we create? This might also help us to learn how to work together to accomplish goals?
I agree. Please note how some showed up on Solution Seeking temporarily, made this naming a big deal, got us off track, and then were never heard from again... There are many possible explanations for that. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I do not intend to get suckered into that kind of thing again. It is a diversion, and, compared to the root cause analysis we are attempting here, a complete waste of time in my opinion. Note how, in the latest Web Links of Interest comments, two are now fighting over His Story, over topics that are of relatively insignificant meaning and relevance compared to what I think should be our immediate goal: HOW do we stop our root cause enemy from harming humanity and the planet. We have had trollling and diversion along perverse feminist lines such that female Solution Seeking participants said that either I censor and ban the trolls of they would quit. We have had hints of religious divide and conquer, including the US Christian arrogance and ultimately detracting from real solutions because GOD IS GOING TO SOLVE IT FOR US IF WE HAVE FAITH. These types of challenges have plagued us in the past. How do we learn from that and avoid them going forward, concentrating on what needs to be done?
Further, one idea I like some times, and don't like other times, follows. Our enemy almost certainly has plans for divide and conquer going forward, it is the master of manipulation and getting people to fall for divide and conquer to distract them from the knowledge that their real root cause enemy is Warren Buffet's class and above with the puppets they install to run most or all institutions and countries on this planet. Simply, the idea is to leverage off the right timing, and turn the enemy's planned 99-split (where 99% roughly are split by the enemy to fight each other) into 99-1 (where the 99% realize what their root cause enemy is, hate its guts with a passion, and decide to destroy it without prejudice). This is in response to your comment about the sides: "The sides are Tyranny vs WeThePeople. Choose a side.". Can we work together or otherwise create one or more publications that go viral and move towards 99-1. Especially in the militaries and intelligence agency rank and file (forget about the cowardly immoral selfish enemy dick sucking leaders there). Take the militaries and we can win. Leave the militaries and the enemy has a powerful trump card it can deal from the back of the pack to destroy us anytime it chooses.
Are these ideas of mine valid? If so, how to work towards making them viral, as soon as possible?
Agreed. Let's look at all possible ways to solve this, publish them along with their pros and cons, and figure out the best way to solve this problem, together, as diverse equal partners?
I have been discussing our challenges with several people. And I must apologize. The process we demonstrate here is perhaps as or more important than the solutions we are hoping to analyze, critique, derive, and present? People no longer know how to seek solutions. The cabal Wenemy is adapt at engineering conflict and placing its double agent leaders on both sides. Blind order following along with well crafted propaganda is used to seed the conflicts. If we can demonstrate that we can use a solution seeking process to achieve the best possible understanding of a wide range of views, show by example, that may help others to see through the nightmares their puppet commanders are leading them into and work out their own best solutions themselves. We cannot possibly anticipate every situation, though I think we should try to cover as wide a spectrum of solutions as possible. Our process will be clearly available online to all who want to see how it works. I am not saying that the journey is more important than the destination, but it is important. Now I will try to figure out how to describe the process that worked for me all those years ago in ways that might work for us. Again, I think we should put a strict, short time limit on this and start with the word and definition. I am perfectly happy to submit start it off by doing my best to give my best guess of the pros and cons of Wenemy and Cabal if that is what it takes. Along with the suggest process we use. Start simple. Work out the kinks in the process. Then apply it to the bigger challenge?
Great idea. How about.... Sustainable Enslavement. Sustainable poverty. Sustainable poisoning. Etc. Great Reset = Slave Reset. Rockefeller 2010 document Clever Together = Conned Forever. Maybe we make a post to invite these kinds of things?
For the few days I've been around here, I am concerned over what my brain perceives as continual fracturing into potentially endless rabbit holes. New word?? Is this REALLY needed to fight this war?? And how do you even Pronounce WWEnemy?? As if stuttering?
I am also concerned about the format you've chosen because you have a growing list of documents, no one has time to read them all (and some contain reiterations and restatements), and since they exist in a timeline string, it's not easy to decide which to read. And as the list grows, now visitors will be scrolling through dozens and more of titles of documents, and .... it just seems like a disorganized mess. Unfortunately, I do not have a solution for this to suggest. For someone who is "not a writer," you are very prolific and I don't see how any working person can keep up.
I'm sorry that this was more a critique without suggestions, but this is what I see so far, FWIW.
Thank you for your valuable criticisms. Criticisms are often the best learning opportunities.
I will offer some thoughts.
1. The New Word is an attempt to avoid the endless meaningless discussions about who the root cause enemy is. I really think we need a new word for that and that was my best guess. I myself do not like it very much. Our Wwenemy invents clever new words all the time. Those new words serve it well. Wwenemy (Wenemy) is an attempt to streamline the think tank process going forward and avoid the frustration endless discussions referenced in the article. If you have an idea of an existing word that will accomplish this, please share. If you have a new idea about a better new word that describes the Wwenemy, please share it. I put the Ww at the front to purposely violate the enemy's linguistic rules and to make it unique, Wenemy was already taken, but it is apparently not common. But I like how Wenemy looks better. Maybe W-w-enemy or something similar?
2. This is the preliminary brainstorming and getting to know people phase. The rabbit holes appear to be an organic part of that. Some people have shared some very useful parts of themselves. My experience is that we did this kind of thing, but in person, at the beginning stages of my successful engineering projects and it worked. I did expect your kinds of valid criticisms.
3. In the engineering think tanks, some people decided that the process was not for them, but they stayed involved as observers. Others wanted to participate. Others left and formed their own groups. I realize it is premature to try to define thesethings here, as this is very different, but perhaps we can find best ways to adapt this to all people who want to be involved. We may decide to split into different groups with different flavors and support each other. Maybe you and/or others could potentially facilitate those groups in your own Substack(s)?
4. At the preliminary brainstorming stage in our ultimately successful engineering think tank projects, others said things very similar to what you have said about the messiness, the rabbit holes, the overwhelming information, etc. The following is a simplification and not striclly accurate, but it is the best I can come up with now.... Generally the Observers split off into different groups and the think tank Participants proceeded. Eventually, through analysis of all the options, the choices concentrated on because clearer, and the solutions formulated. But there were times when we wondered if it would succeed. This project here is the only of its type I am aware of on the planet. It may fail and need to be re designed and attempted in another way. But, even if that happens, the failure offers learning opportunities.
5. You are correct. I cannot keep up. Soon we will need to find ways of sharing the load or splitting. Today I got a frightening email from Substack... CONGRATULATIONS, YOU HAVE OVER 100 SUBSCRIBERS. I am surprised and apprehensive. The email continued.... OFTEN ALL IT TAKES IS ONE POST OR ONE SHARE TO GROW THAT TO THOUSANDS. The optimum size for our engineering groups was 4-7 people. But, at the preliminary brainstorming stage, we often had much more. But we did not have over 100.
6. Initially, before launching this think tank attempt, I was impressed with the quality of articles, writers, and commenters on Substack. But Substack is not designed for this. There are already sporadic, confusing, and suspicious errors that often put replies to comments in the wrong places, adding to the types of frustrations you correctly point out. It is not very likely this think tank approach cannot work on Substack, as referenced in some of the other articles.
7. This problem IS challenging. It is the most challenging thing I have ever faced. It might turn out to be impossibly challenging, but some will probably stick with it. Others probably won't. If you decide to leave, we have still created win/win? You have read the ideas here and have ideas about how to do it better. That is important.
8. I cannot thank you enough. Many here are very polite, and that is great. But we will need to all offer the kinds of meaningful, well thought out, respectfully presented, and easy to understand types of constructive criticisms you offer. I have a lot of favorite comments so far, and your comment is one of my favorites, is so very important for us, especially at this time.
I hope you reply. The numbers above are another hold over from the engineering think tank days. I wonder if Substack will put this reply in the right place this time...
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
Just a clarification: Cabal is a widely-understood and often-used term, but others in current usage include Elites, Non-elected bureaucrats, Globalists, Black Hats, Satanists, and still sometimes Illuminati. I'm sure I missed some. :) I like Remarque88's term, "the Money-Magic Families." So descriptive because these people are the Babylonian Money Magic creators. Of course, I still like the term from Alaje the Pleiadian, "Evil Earth Controllers." That one has a special place in my <3
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
I like Cabal because it's already well-known, states concisely how these hidden people operate, is easily pronounced, doesn't require the populace we hope to reach learning new difficult words, etc. Why not use what is already available in this case? "Illuminati" was the operative word for 25 years, then the Community decided to stop using that word because these people are no where near "enlightened beings." Cabal really sums up how they operate.
I've noticed some people get triggered by the word "cabal." Hard to guess why in all instances.
The Synthetic Left seem to be triggered by almost anything that does not fit within a very tightly proscribed range of preapproved subjects, so the mere mention of what's really going on around all of us, let alone exploring the true intentions behind what that is, probably is not going to register, regardless of the terms used. In which case--one could argue--introducing a new term might actually pique curiosity.
I don't know much about how the Right operates. When I quit the so-called Left or anything to do with Leftish politics, it was because of how the Synthetic Left went completely Gestapo, especially during the initial phases of the COVID project. But I didn't go Right, in response. (I've never been categorizable within what I consider to be the duopoly's non-choices, to begin with.)
I can guess how the Synthetic Left might react to certain things, because there are so many in my family and among former colleagues and I'm familiar with where they're coming from. In my opinion, their reactions are predictable, at least to a degree.
To my way of thinking, the word "cabal" has taken on a sort of teflon coating. And it has lost much of its meaning or power. And although I haven't seen it listed as a prohibited term in specific contexts, I was watching an alternative media podcaster, not long ago, who demeaned the use of the term, making it sound like it equates with shadowy, unprovable conspiracy arguments. Obviously, there are those who think that way about a lot of terms, besides "cabal." But this reminds me that there is resistance to the term.
On the other hand, I'm not explicitly advocating for "wwenemy" (or variations of that concocted new word) as the best alternative to "cabal." This discussion has barely started. We've not really taken the conversation very far, yet.
But since you brought up the word, I wanted to add that I would agree "cabal" has lost whatever power it may once have had.
As you suggest, "cabal" may sum up HOW "they" operate, and at least in a sense I would agree that is true. But it really doesn't identify WHAT their intentions are for us. It makes it sound like "they" are off in the distance doing this mostly unnamed thing and in a really shady sort of way.
It doesn't help us unmask WHO "they" are.
NB: Before typing my response, here, and hitting "Post," your comment had been shifted all the way to the bottom, essentially out of sight. I have no idea if your comment, along with my reply to it, will stay down here. If you're not already aware of the extent of the problem with comment threads mis-nesting (or failing to nest at all, sending lone comments anywhere on the page but where they belong), you might want to have a look at Larry's pinned comment associated with this related posting of his: https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/challenging-suspicious-substack-errors/comments
[COMMENT RESPOND TO Mary-Ann: "I like Cabal because" made Jan 17 2023 9:16 PM US Pacific time]
I can see both sides of this and have been on both sides. This is how a think tank works. These things are discussed. The participants understand each other's perspectives. If we cannot make a consensus, we adapt as well as possible. If some decide to use a new word, and others decide to use an existing word, my best guess right now is that we should enhance our credibility by working together to make a publication that shows all sides. Really, presenting all possible reasonable ways of how to stop the cabal or Wenemy from continuing to escalate its class war against humanity and all life on the planet is my best guess at what this group should be prioritizing, and soon. Proceeding with the discussions and then writing a full spectrum article about what words could be used to describe the cabal - Wenemy might be good formative practice for us, and a chance for us to get to know each other better, and a chance for us to define and meet goals?
This is the type of comment that often goes to the wrong place. That is why I put the brackets in on the top. Let's see where it goes...
A few minutes after sending, this comment appears to be in the right place, so far. The time now is 9:24 PM US Pacific Time.
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
I just used "Save As PDF" to save this entire file for future reference. It is clear. Some of my almost identical comments are in the right place, and some are in the wrong place.
Larry ~ What a great read. You are a very thorough gentleman, indeed! Knowing you this short time but through your very personal writings, I was confident to share my thoughts without fear that you'd have a bad response. You did not disappoint. I am fairly new to Substack, I think I have 3 subscriptions. I didn't think about the size of the group, but your observation regarding the "congrats" email you got was right on. My mind went, "100 ...." Yeah, it's hard enough to have a discussion with 6 or 9 people.
Regarding the idea that you've stated before of certain kinds or reasons of 'splitting off' and maybe 'sharing' ... I just don't know what to say. Makes me think of "cells" they'd talk about regarding certain organizations, or even of how Anon is 'structured'. At that point, you go from the father of a thing to its grandfather, and then you go off and do ... what? Create another seed project which others splinter off from yet again? I mean, as I write this, I am trying to define your true purpose, beyond the stated one of trying to help the planet and people from getting destroyed (heavily paraphrased - I'm actually late for bed! lol)
Well, it is true that once a creator breathes life into a creation, they lose all control of it. :D
Your comments are kind, relevant, and powerful. They challenge us/me in meaningful ways. Thank you so much. Please bear with me, I am tired, but feel compelled to write this, doing my best. These challenges like yours are needed. I cannot settle on guidelines. There are so many possibilities. My hope was to freeze this at where it was a few days ago, give the comments a chance, and then figure out where to go. Then I got a comment that was complex, but to me it kind of singled out Jews as the root cause. That is what finally got me, out of frustration, to try to streamline it and focus it by putting my best attempt at a new word to describe our root cause enemy. Both the definition and word I hurriedly chose are in need of improvement? Please help us come up with a better word, even if it is WENEMY, and we live with the small ambiguity and fact it is already kind of taken? I do think we need a new word suggestion for the root cause, one that is unique, non ambiguous, and clearly defined, so we can save ourselves this trouble or endless run arounds. It is curious that nobody else has come up with that word, at least not to my knowledge. We have brainstormed goals. That needs to be refined. There are many kinds of goals. I have very different ideas compared to others. We could rough in a framework for what lies ahead after the goals, which might split the group, which might be good.. Present a lawful suggestion of the range and classes of solutions, from the most passive and peaceful solutions, to the most aggressive and non lawful solutions, but be careful to discuss them lawfully. Novels are written about unlawful things, movies are made about them, they are discussed, and we will only discuss them in a lawful manner here, hoping that discussion shows that they should be avoided. It that discussion reveals they are needed, we have a problem. I have done this with myself and know that my analysis is incomplete and flawed. I am still struggling with how to lawfully discuss the unlawful solutions. Many are frustrated with the way the world is going and might make some comments here in ways that might cause them a lot of trouble. Before going on I want to work with others to do our best to avoid that kind of thing. I am not at all comfortable with what very crude guidelines in this area that I have offered so far. And there are risks. Some much smarter than me in law, political science, etc. tell me things like: "COVID validated beyond a doubt that there is no rule of law anymore. Assange is in jail forever for exposing the truth and possibly making mistakes with women that he shouldn't have made while NSA head Clapper lied several times under oath and, as far as I know, faced no actions." I am willing to take the risks myself if we can discover smart ways to do it that are effective and worth it. Intuition tells me that the answers to this will require a courageous exploration of all options, with the stated goal of never doing anything unlawful online here, never inciting violence, never planning violence, not falling for entrapment or other traps set by Wenemy agents, but discussing the entire range, simulating them, comparing them, discussing and learning of all the pros and cons, and then professionally publishing it in the best strategic ways after extensive group edits, written by the best writers we have, so the quality is exceptional. Time is short, when do we start moving on this? There is a lot of material, so maybe we stall here and give ourselves a chance to learn, share, trade comments, get to know each other, etc., and then proceed in the best possible ways? I am tired too and hope I am not going around in circles too badly. Sweet dreams. Thanks again. I hope you will stay and help us. We could really use your help.
Our time here may be coming to a close. Please take a look at the following and, if possible, share your thoughts in comments there. This is complex enough without this kind of possible sabotage. I have asked them to share their source code because, as a programmer, I cannot see how this is possible without malice, with one exception... Maybe somebody else does that coding for them and they just installed an upgrade? Either way, I invite them to share. Why would this kind of thing be happening if we weren't onto something here? Or is there another explanation?
It might not be malice. This would be extremely mild or low-level malice, if that's what it was. Likely, it's that substack is a relatively new platform and may have bugs. That's normal. We have enough to be 'paranoid' about, without beating the sheets looking for more -- eh? :D
Maybe we shall see? I asked Substack for their source code. I would love to see how this is possible if it is not being done maliciously, and being done only to us, and only some of the time? A coding error should occur all of the time and to everybody. I have coded for years, run countless complex tree based software programs, programmed them myself, and this smells of malice.
Here is one of many rabbit holes this opened. I have expanded the fragmented comments, saved them, and backed them up. If it happens to you, where you make a reply, and then it goes to the wrong place, you will see for yourself. We have never seen anything like this anywhere else. And, it was working fine at first, and does not occur in any other sub stacks, just ours. It appears to be getting worse. If it goes away, that would be good, but strange.
Several others have validated this, as discussed here, and elsewhere.
Maybe try an experiment? Try making a comment to the thread above, clicking Return To Thread, and see if it happens to you. Can you find your comment? Is it where is should be? If it doesn't happen, try finding other comments of yours after you make them. You may be treated to having the comment appear on the screen in the right place, the screen flickering later, and the comment then going to the wrong place. Or maybe, for some reason, it just won't happen to you, and that is also, from a programmer's point of view, very strange, and indicates possible malice.
Hello Mary-Ann. I am going through and archiving of the posts, manually expanding the comments and archiving them, and I though that you might want to try jumping right to the solution and sharing with us?
Please take a look at this suggestion if you haven't already? I would love to read your reply to it.
An Open Invitation For Readers To Use Their Visualization And Creative Writing Skills To Solve The World's Problems
Good suggestions. I some ways, even though the Urban Dictionary indicated WENEMY is taken, I prefer it. Maybe we just always capitalize it to distinguish it? WWENEMY? WENEMY? Maybe a linguistic wizard will come up with something better in a timely manner? And the definition I quickly put out there? Maybe getting that correct is equally or more important. Discussion and suggestions are valuable, even with the growing frequency of the confusing Substack reply placement errors. Can't wait to see where Substack places this comment...
At this time, so far, this comment is in the right place.
Thank you for clearly stating your valuable thoughts. A good think tank explores all options. I view this possible definition selection or otherwise as team building and practice for what lies ahead. Hopefully we do not spend a lot of time on it, and we get our best guess out there, containing all reasonable view points, and all reasonable options, soon. I may be different, but if I read a well written summary of an attempt like this, complete with opposing views, and some options, the group doing that would gain credibility in my eyes. Remember some of the old, now obsolete, and extinct, new debates, where they would have real debates on opposing viewpoints? Where did that go? I really miss that.
Further to my last comment, my hope is that we could complete this very soon, and get onto the more important tasks. I submit that we should not allow this, or anything else, to slow us down. The word debate should be over with and published in a maybe a few days, a week at the most? If we can't do that, how will we possibly present a similar thing containing all possible viable solutions to the world's problems? The odds are that lofty goal fails. Hopefully Solution Seeking continues in other ways. If people just start thinking "boy, maybe we should be seeking solutions", it would be a pleasant surprise. I have many things that got put on hold to try to launch this and they need my attention, so I cannot continue to spend the hours on this that I am spending now. For me, this word exercise is an attempt to see if this group is capable of the larger solution seeking I seek, or if it wants to do other things. The comment thread issue is a potentially debilitating blow to all of this and may destroy this group. If so, it is not a total failure. I really hope we can fully honor, understand, and represent your views as we go forward. Time will tell...
If you are not familiar with Remarque88, consider this latest video of his. He does excellent work and almost always gets things framed 'just right'. I don't offer this so much as an example, but rather, I really want you and the other members to hear what he is saying here. This could be very excellent news, if it holds. https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RmLLgWUx1FQ/?list=notifications&randomize=false
But, when I read it, to me, the preferred scenario is not Lock Step, but Clever Together. One of my many interpretations follows... Perhaps they used COVID to get the majority jabbed, and everybody busy concentrating on other things. They put quantum dots in everything so everybody has their nano technology growing inside. They plan to turn the visible prison of Lock Step into a more powerful but invisible prison of Clever Together. It is possible they will sacrifice the useful idiot minions like the Free Masons, maybe even some of the royalty. After all, as Bezmenov said, they know too much. Once the undisclosed unaudited entity that controls the world has got its SCADA wireless control over all the SCADA slaves, it might not need its upper level minions anymore, and may destroy them. The worst prisons are invisible prisons. And the worst slaves are those who have been successfully fooled into thinking they have won? The 5G+ continues to roll out. The quantum dot and nano tech mutations continue to spread through all life on the planet? And we still don't know what is at the very top of the cabal's command chain? The cabal now allows its inbred inferior anti-elites to show how despicable and stupid they are for all to see, possibly in preparation to sacrifice them? There are reports that 50% of the Davos clown puppets did not show up. I heard supposed inner circle (swearing to privacy as to source) stories that the cabal planned to sacrifice royalty, and that might include King Charles, who was quite vocal when COVID first hit, but has been much more silent since. I also heard unsubstantiated rumors that King Charles and his interests control Substack. So I mention that here in an effort to potentially divide and conquer near the top of the cabal's 1%. Might as well give it a shot?
I love it. Thank you. Your great suggestion also sparked an idea, I think I will make a pinned comment out of it...
A SUGGESTION
Perhaps we work together to analyze this and select the best possible new word, acronym, or short phrase (etc) for the concept of Wwenemy? Perhaps we publish this as a group? As a group we work together to make sure the publication is well written and quit relying on me to do that myself? The publication could include the best word, phrase, acronym, etc. that we select, an overall short definition we discuss and agree upon, and, also, the personalized definitions submitted by people who want to contribute their interpretation of the definition (with or without their names, as per their wishes)? One of the goals of Solution Seeking is to present full range discussions of all solutions, so why not do something similar with the new definitions we create?
Continue on Sstack for now…gather ideas. Take on roles/tasks by volunteer and its a go. The Kiss principle serves well usually… and having a few named trios of writers may make the think tank function well.
Hi Brek - I do appreciate your points, but since this is a solutions site, I don't expect to see many Lefties here. You might be the exception. I just can't agree on inventing a new word. I know there are a lot of supposed "truthers" who just like to attack stuff, call names, etc. I ignore these people. I don't know of ANYONE using Any other term besides "Cabal" these days. No teflon coating to it for 'us'. They ARE shadowy people, but I can name many of them. In fact, it is very well known who many of them are; and despite varying last names such as Schwab, Clinton, Podesta, Zuckerberg, and so many others, they are mainly Rockefellers or Rothschilds. It's possible there are some above even these "elite" people whose names are less well-known, but a great number of Cabal higher-ups are definitely identified. It's their Minions, who are in greater numbers, that are not all known individually, but many of them can be discerned by their speech and actions. Thanks for the comment.
[reply to Mary-Ann comment "Hi Brek - I do appreciate you..." sent 9:48 PM US Pacific Time Jan 172023]
Hi Mary Ann. I just took a look at your last comment. These are great think tank like discussions. I see the points on all sides.
Can you please take a look at the placement of your comment in the URL below? Is your comment placed where it should be? To me, it looks like it might be on the wrong tree. I would have expected it under Brek's comment, but for me, that is not where it is showing up now.
My point about a teflon coating is whether the term in question, "cabal," sticks to the intended target.
I would contend that it does not, at this point, serve that purpose.
It is in that regard I meant the term "cabal" has become teflon coated. Slides right off the target.
The word "cabal" might still resonate with the discussion group(s) you're referring to who are sorting out how the "they" that we're also talking about here (a.k.a., the "cabal") operate. In which case, how the term resonates within a discussion group would point more to an internal function.
But does the term stick to the intended target? Or does it even begin to show us what is really going on, at what are mostly unseen levels (unseen by us)?
(Above the upper-mid-level puppets you listed--I would contend--are literal trillionaires and multi-trillionaire families. They are hiding. And who they are might also be a good question for us all to try to at least allow for.)
We need something, in my opinion, that is more functional at unmasking. But I'm also not trying to change the minds of anyone already wedded to a term.
I have been discussing our challenges with several people. And I must apologize. The process we demonstrate here is perhaps as or more important than the solutions we are hoping to analyze, critique, derive, and present? People no longer know how to seek solutions. The cabal Wenemy is adapt at engineering conflict and placing its double agent leaders on both sides. Blind order following along with well crafted propaganda is used to seed the conflicts. If we can demonstrate that we can use a solution seeking process to achieve the best possible understanding of a wide range of views, show by example, that may help others to see through the nightmares their puppet commanders are leading them into and work out their own best solutions themselves. We cannot possibly anticipate every situation, though I think we should try to cover as wide a spectrum of solutions as possible. Our process will be clearly available online to all who want to see how it works. I am not saying that the journey is more important than the destination, but it is important. Now I will try to figure out how to describe the process that worked for me all those years ago in ways that might work for us. Again, I think we should put a strict, short time limit on this and start with the word and definition. I am perfectly happy to submit start it off by doing my best to give my best guess of the pros and cons of Wenemy and Cabal if that is what it takes. Along with the suggest process we use. Start simple. Work out the kinks in the process. Then apply it to the bigger challenge?
Hi, this will be real quick because I have to get ready for work. I was not referring to one or more "discussion groups." I was referring to the entirety of the Truther community and the podcasters on Rumble, BitChute, YouTube, etc et alia.
I find this partially comical and partially *par for the course* with humans. They never get off the dime because they seem mentally unable to get past the small, unimportant *isht*, ever! I hold little hope for the human race. Anything that gets accomplished with respect to ridding the planet of the Bad Actors will probably require much off-world coaching and other assistance.
[Edited several times]. Wow. Thank you. Deja vu. At times I share what might be similar frustrations. At other times I feel differently.
Noteworthy is that this is the only type of Solution Seeking attempt of this sort I have ever discovered anywhere on the planet. Is anybody aware of another at this time? Does anybody find that curious?
Many humans just fell for the lies. Others realized they were being lied to, but have chosen to gather information (can't ever have too many details), immerse in the fear porn, and follow their controlled opposition rock star of choice. Hardly anybody wants to seek real solutions to the global problems. Most don't even want to discuss solutions.
Daring to propose a discussion of this type of solution seeking got my comments banned on Banned.Video. A badge of honor and/or a pathetic failure? The controlled opposition rock stars, Igan, Jones, etc. do not seek these kinds of solutions. Isn't that kind of thing curious? Igan ignored my attempts to dialogue with him about this but has time for certain types of communication. I really like Igan and am in no way criticizing him, he is a very busy, intelligent, insightful, courageous and compassion human being. And he is an amazing guitarist, unique, one of the best ever. LinkedIn started censoring my attempts to seek these kinds of solutions and long term colleagues who used to excel in solution seeking decided to permanently cut all ties to me because I dared to use the word "cabal" and was therefore obviously a "conspiracy theorist". People have changed.
Another long time ex friend, very high IQ, PHD, able to do very advanced yoga, writing, and complex math with ease decades ago, warned me about nano tech being the greatest danger in human history in 1989. After COVID hit the same person (on the driver's license at least) told me that Snopes proved that COVID was what the authorities are saying and that I have deteriorated into a paranoid conspiracy theorist. I note that person has lived in extreme EMF conditions in an urban environment for decades. I could write a book about how people have changed. Some technical details are discussed here.
I tried and failed to get real conversations about this type of solution seeking going with several in local freedom groups, freedom cells, etc. They seem to think that this will blow over or run out of steam before the cabal comes for them. They have their controlled opposition cookbooks and many have somehow acquired significant wealth and property since COVID hit while most of the rest of the population has suffered through worsening conditions. In a county where acreages are priced highly (out of the reach of most) and the cabal has made it almost impossible to develop your own land, one group magically somehow acquired a mansion on a nicely cultivated couple of acres at under half the going price. You have to love how things just "fall into place" for some who believe in things like "The Secret" and attract followers who will not engage in solution seeking but, rather, follow published guide books that tell them everything they need to know? While the people at the controlled opposition mansion are nice and may not realize any of this, they offer meeting space, skill shares, etc. But they offer no group sustainable farming, shelter for victims, sub acreages where victims can camp, etc. Maybe their CC&R's prohibit this.
I almost opened discussion about all these points but didn't. That discussion would have probably not gone well. They have a Discord Channel and I left that channel because of steady deterioration in their ability to engage in any kind of Solution Seeking. They even had a kind of carnival with a very famous controlled opposition rock star I will not name here. That rock star looked at me in fear and disgust when I brought up global solution seeking. What could be behind that?
No matter what happens in this challenging Substack Solution Seeking group, I am thankful for what has happened so far. For me, this is far, far better than anything else I have seen or tried in the past few years. I am not saying anything negative about the people I refer to in the freedom cells, freedom groups, etc. They are great people and I love them. My best guess is they have no idea and might be hurt if they read this. Solution Seeking is best done without ego involvement, looking at all valid reasonable viewpoints, discussing them all, and clearly publishing the pros, cons, and attributes of all of them. Sometimes a consensus is reached, sometimes it isn't. We will hopefully not present yet another confined narrow field cookbook like the many other versions already out there?
I would not worry so much about what you call "rock star" controlled opposition truthers, unless they are lying completely, their messages and info will get to those ready to hear it. Yes your correct about ego being very dangerous in this regard. I think Max I , is genuine and real and usually quite correct and blunt , A. J, for example regardless of what he is or is not has reached an enormous audience with lots of good info , usually ahead of most. I was talking and educating on all this before A.J. and even before David Icke who I have the greatest respect for. BEFORE people can get to SOLUTIONS in action , they have to really build a knowledge base yes , most are way behind the curve , but your seeing , Im seeing daily more and more are ready and in movement and action.
Great comments. Many pertinent points. Thanks. Yes, the broader the knowledge base, the better. But a good think tank might not need to wait for everybody to build that base, we will provide it for them in the dialogue and what we compare, innovate, join, and build. We can reference these excellent sources but, hopefully, we don't just accept one of their solutions and quit, thinking we are done. If that happens, in my mind, we will have failed, and the Wenemy will have somehow succeeded in destroying the positive potential of this group. It is already doing that extremely well, in covert, cowardly ways, and it will escalate if we persist and start getting close to the best solutions it wants to prevent us from discovering.
For those who are convinced they already know the best solution, please share it. For those who are unwilling to discuss other solutions, maybe this Solution Thinking think tank is not for you.
I am not worried about them. I support many of them and deeply admire them. Max I is one of my favorites. But, where is the discussion about multiple possible solutions to solve this? Why the endless useless guaranteed to fail strategies like FOLKS ARE WAKING UP, WE HAVE TO WAKE FOLKS UP? The vague WE MUST PUSH BACK, but then no engagement in discussion the wide range of HOW TO PUSH BACK? If we can learn to engage properly here in solution seeking, we might, together solve this. Nobody else is going to even try that. The Wenemy, cabal, or whatever has apparently succeeded in stalling this group. If that persists, I will adjust accordingly. If that persists, I advise others to consider doing their version of something similar. Learn from what happened in this group and improve upon it and solve this situation. We can never rely on any one person, one idea, one concept, one definition, one process, or we will likely fail like all the others have apparently failed. We need to innovate and come up with more alternatives, not just spit out previous models and put our faith in things we have little or no influence over? Sure, we can, and should examine all existing possibilities, the pros, the cons, try mixing them together, make up some new ones or sijmjilar ones, etc. Think tank, like what our Wenemy cabal does.
You are too smart to ask the question why are they not discussing SOLUTIONS ? We all must come to understanding what "we can or cant do and what is most productive," then if we are smart we are careful not to openly talk about it online until its safely in motion or done , we talk about it only with those involved and in person. SK
Yes!! Thanks. Greatly appreciated. There are probably ways to optimize what you discuss. We need to find them. Do as much as we can lawfully do online and set it up so others can put the final pieces in the jigsaw puzzle, or shuffle all the pieces and make a better solution? Provide a model of how solution seeking can work. Maybe starting with the simple task.... Cabal, Wenemy, or something else? If we can't dialogue about that and create a meaningful article covering all known relevant aspects of it together and work together to publish our results as an example of how online solution seeking can work, then I will not be spending nearly as much time on this Substack going forward, and I will concentrate on other things. If we fail, I will probably leave this Substack up as is and make infrequent posts and try to try to analyze why it failed.
I understand you perfectly. In some respects, I think we both see the writing already. This is just too unwieldy. I think I figured out the comments issue, though. This site functions with an older style of presenting a thread. Therefore, one has a growing number of faint lines going down the left-hand side. This is also unwieldy, but if you want to know what reply goes to what original comment, you have to count and keep track of the lines, then follow it up to where it 'hooks' to. Like anyone is really going to do that, ROFL. :D
Yes. Yes yes yes oh sorry, lol :D Alex Jones' videos and podcasts were important to my early learning, for sure. No one who saw the Bohemian Grove video will ever forget it without intentionally slamming the door (to their mind) shut. I also loved the videos of him confronting limo-ensconced monsters arriving to "world" meetings like Davos. David Icke is an institution and another important source of information, over the years, on his focused range of topics -- exactly the ones this group proposes to grapple with. I listened to Max I frequently in the 2020s and then felt the inkling to stop. Not meaning to say anything negative about him with that, it's just what happened and I didn't analyze it. But I am STUNNED by your statement that you were "talking and educating on all this before AJ and... David Icke." MY GOD, MAN! Did you have clearances? Were you a user of the pre-civilian internet? At least, you must have (had) amazing contacts.... Remote viewing? You have me completely intrigued! :D
No I simply had the vision to see the future at a very young age , supported by a mother who understood much of this , this may sound strange but I remembered that this would be in my lifetime and I would be involved in doing something about it, because I also remembered attempting to do so in the 18th century when much of this was planned and launched it really goes that much farther back. , I was not very successful then. When in my teenage years , I began to seriously study in depth many such things , even into a very esoteric level, I saw a movie made by Gene Roddenberry of Star Trek fame , he made a pilot movie for a series he wanted to make called SPECTER , it showed all this very clearly , including the demonic and Reptilian aspect. I had huge downloads of info that this was indeed the case long before David I , wrote anything. His series was of course canceled , but you can find this movie , and it may be on the net as well. Then the contact with others who knew this stuff and many mentors filled in the rest. I would then find the information and evidence was everywhere, PARTICULARLY in the Vatican/Jesuit/Freemasonic structures, as well as my studies of ancient advanced civilizations and lost tech. There is much more but that will give some clues. Because of all this starting at a very young age , I have stayed out of this entrapping system and lived off grid my entire adult life.
Haha. No clearance. No remote viewing. I knew people who disclosed confidential cabal information information and I promised never to reveal their names or the details. Suffice to say I was highly skeptical. While I was skeptical of what they said, through the years, it continued to add up. In my undergraduate engineering years I noted that some of the Maxwell EMF equations that were in my dad's early 1900's physics text were not in what they were teaching us. My prof had never seen the equations before and thought they were excluded because they were probably proven wrong. Research at the library indicated otherwise. Then in my PHD chasing years (before I woke up and got out with some of my sanity and a master's) I encountered some strange things in the advanced mathematics used for continuum mechanics. The reactions of the faculty to my associated questions further tied it together. The skepticism grew. While keeping the confidences, I had long conversations with many friends much smarter than me about this. We looked at every conceivable option and explanation. Explanations like what Jones and Icke said years later were among the possibilities we came up with. We considered many different flavors of these things, all with a probability, none held as absolutely true. All have their strengths and weaknesses. Now those friends who used to love discussing things like this no longer have any use for those discussions, or for me. We discussed these things and came up with them independently. Years before I even knew of Jones and/or Icke. I found it very interesting to discover how Icke and Jones came up with it. It is somewhat similar to what I did.
For me, everything remains a probability in a sea of endless possibilities. I am amazed at those who have one belief system and think one model is correct and the other ones are wrong.
See the power of Solution Seeking?
See the power of a diverse team of well meaning people? We are all somewhat similar but also very different. We might be able to solve this.
I grew up with this attitude... Solution Seeking in the 1960's. Consideration of all alternatives until the best one is discovered. Let's find that third alternative? Not with a commander. But, as equal partners? I do not like any of the solutions I have seen so far. How about you?
Larry, regarding the person you knew in 1989 who had a brain then but doesn't now (and I will get to the post you've linked at https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/enemy-emf-silent-weapons-for-quiet), I want to jump in and add that I've noticed similar changes in people I've worked with during at least a decade and a half, in some cases longer, who were the type to "adopt early" when it came to the not-very-smart-to-be-using so-called 'smart'-phones. These people never questioned the EMF soup they were living in, as a result. (I am "living in," as well, of course, because there's no escape for most of us, even when we've limited/eliminated/never even "adopted" in the first place.)
That EMF soup will change you, over time. I've witnessed this in others AND how it has changed me, even though I avoid where possible. The effect is ratcheted up, incrementally, over time, but most don't feel it. I do.
A facile phrase during COVID-ClownWorld that I've heard has been the observation: "COVID broke a lot of people's brains." Because it did. This in-your-face, very-bad-to-be-using tech (tech that is so VERY in-your-face about how VERY bad it is to be using, that I believe we're being mocked by the whatever-nemy for our weaknesses) has been coupled with massively orchestrated propaganda, wiping away a chunk of humanity.
By "wiped away," I mean that they may be unreachable. I don't want to invest in that sort of dismissiveness. I want to hold out hope that they can be reached. But I'm seeing signs, like you've pointed out, that they're really not.
Brandon's latest post addresses this. I haven't even finished reading, but wanted to share this bit that stands out to me:
"Note, the C19 jabs are a neurotechnology backdoor into the human mind. It embeds 'cybernetic' material into the body and also electromagnetically hardens the body/mind over time, but removes slowly your control of your mind and motor cortex. The lower your body mass index (BMI) the quicker you are impacted by it. If you use EMF devices (smart phones, etc.) it assembles faster. "
Excellent and agreed, as someone who has NEVER used a cell phone , or owned a TV and has lived off grid my entire adult life , I have a different perspective and have always been astonished that all these people cant SEE whats happening to them , and how they are being changed , addicted and dependent. I recently wrote a song about this called Digital Zombies, which is what they have or are becoming. Along with this is a very noticeable hostility toward anyone providing information to them about these dangers, and or refusing to use it all and become programmed for their own destruction.
I admire those rare people who had the intelligence and wisdom to avoid these EMF poison weapons. And I cannot claim to have been at all like that. I experienced the brain damage and other EMF issues as I was exposed for decades in my engineering, with a cell phone in my breat pocket, developing arrhythmia, and still not getting it despite being told. When I retired in 2016 I setup an electronics lab with wireless IoT devices everywhere, there was so much radiation that my wireless MIDI guitar did not work due to interference. They had not expected that level of interference from so many devices in their design. I have recovered to an extent, but I know first hand what this does to people, having gone through it myself. For whatever reasons, the CDS gave me an additional significant recovery, and I have not yet encountered any information about why that might be have happened. I can therefore understand some of why people go along with this wireless addiction, having done so myself. But I figured it out and adjusted. I have tried to share with people in ways that might get them to adjust like I did, have had some successes, but far too many failures. I realize they are adults and all I can do is my best, but I would really like to learn how to be more convincing.
I will apologize for my incomplete and misleading writing... The person I used to know changed. They are still intelligent, sharp, a leader in their field, and capable of some incredible things, as long as those things are things they are already proficient in. Anything different or new is challenging for them. They are much more conformist now and are adverse to taking risks that might expose their new challenges. They, like most, are now completely incapable of dealing with today's challenges, as predicted by EMF expert Dr. Martin Pall on page 17 of this document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cAgIsctzvtyTeNCXsOcWjirXUshmvx2X/view
They are also in denial and do not want to hear about it. A complete personality change.
The Brandon article is excellent. Did you know that he has joined us by subscribing to Solution Seeking? He is very busy with his development work so it is not clear how much he might participate.
But that form of so-called intelligence you refer to is, according to the way I look at things, "really, really stupid." If there's no soul left or the operating mode of the "intelligence" is to reinforce bankrupt approaches to life and to learning and contributes to further bankrupting the learning process for others, what has one got, there? Nothing that I want to have anything to do with.
There are PhDs in my family whom COVID has turned into drooling idiots. It is truly astounding to witness.
Good points. At times I feel like you do. At other times I feel differently.
We are at war with the cabal Wenemy? So far, the world's population has not done much to retaliate in this war, it is maybe more of a slaughter by the cabal Wenemy? All people are possible assets? What can be done to use all possible assets to strategic advantage (while understanding the attributes of the assets)? Is it not best to discuss assets with as much compassion as possible (a severe challenge for me at times)? Buffet's side of the class war has significantly harmed all of us, some to a greater extent than others? Should we not try to remind all who have been harmed of this fact in strategically optimized ways so those assets might realize who their real root cause enemies are and perhaps be motivated to consider doing the best things? Sorry, more questions than answers right now. But, perhaps that is a good thing?
My guess is that this comment is going to go off into nowhere land but I will send it anyhow. I note how this comment thing is having a significant negative impact on my engagement here and want to find a way of avoiding it, but I an no longer keep up with all of this, and I am doing it pretty much 24x7.
The conundrum of how to reach the seemingly unreachable is a new and even more challenging phenomenon under COVID than it ever was before, and for all the tech-related reasons touched on elsewhere in comments, here, not just because of the effect of weaponized propaganda (a.k.a., the narrative).
People are so broken that they're cutting themselves off even from POTENTIAL communication with those of us who are not yet zombified.
December 2020 was the last time I sent out holiday cards (also known as "Christmas" greetings). That was before the rollout of the killshots, and in my 2020 newsletter, included with the snail-mailed cards, I hadn't said anything about the promised (threatened) not-a-vaccine. All I did was point to a lot of questions that I had about how COVID was being (mis)handled.
Apparently that was all it took for one (now former) friend. She waited two years, and this December sent me what was closer to a "Dear John" letter than holiday wishes. In it, she said she was no longer teaching because she thought it wasn't a great idea to be around so many "unvaccinated" children, and that she was going to focus her energies on the other hands-on facet of her work.
Fine. It's her perfect right to do that. (Even though I find her anti-science and anti-children message about "vaccines" to be very troubling.) But the USPS stamp cancellation showed a different location than the address I have for her, and she included no return address label on the envelope.
It's that kind of weirdness...one could even say, underhandedness...that makes communication impossible with these people.
This is me recently saying my piece to just one faction of the whatever-nemy:
(My 1/18/23 public comment to FDA via https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/forgotten-mission/ concerning FDA’s upcoming January 26, 2023 VRBPAC advisory committee meeting to discuss “the future [so-called] vaccination regimens addressing COVID-19”:)
"The injected-COVID-immune-compromise and/or injected-Adverse-Events COVID project shows all the signs of being a crime against humanity. The depopulation effect is of such massive proportions never before seen in world history as part of a so-called public health response that if the data coming in, during early 2021, weren't enough to convince authorities that the shots were killing and maiming people and should be stopped, the only conclusion can be that authorities were in on and aware of and okay with causing carnage.
"Previously respected or at least grudgingly tolerated institutions at the state, national and global levels have openly coordinated in a calculated and/or mutually coerced effort essentially to remove humanity from the planet. That is the clear effect of this state-sponsored event.
"There are not yet convincing signs that this COVID depopulation-by-injection effort is slowing down or stopping, even though more and more of the citizenry are waking up to what's happening.
"If officials at the FDA are concerned that they might not be forgiven for their malfeasance, they might wish to consider relocating to a different planet. This one--called Earth--belongs to us humans."
Well said. Thank you. Congratulations. Very impressive. I wish there were more hours in the day. I am keeping a LibreOffice document WEB LINKS OF INTEREST that I hope to publish in Substack Solution Seeking soon. I would like to put this on that list with your permission and guidance. Perhaps you would write a short summary of the website? Perhaps something like the start idea I give below (sorry I am rushing this, I am way behind in the Solution Seeking comments):
"Substack Solution Seeking Bret has created an excellent website ..."
It was because of Vera Sharav that I first learned about Stand for Health Freedom. (I joined in early December of 2020.) I can't easily locate (and do not recall) what her association with them may have been--official, unofficial, advisory, formerly any or all, or none of the above? But I do recall that she became a health freedom advocate, herself, after her son was killed by a prescription drug ill-suited for him or for his condition.
It's hard not to listen when a Holocaust survivor tells you that the authoritarianism we've been experiencing under the COVID project is the same as what was happening under Nazism or that had led to that historical set of crimes.
I don't want to overwhelm you with more info. about this or any other sort of tangential aspect of the overarching issues, but just in case, here is Vera Sharav's more recent activism as it relates to COVID-ClownWorld:
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and human rights advocate, speaks first at the 75th Anniversary Event of the Nuremberg Code in Nuremberg, Germany, on August 20, 2022.
Thanks Brek. I just briefly looked at the first two links (some people are doing great work) and put your entire email into my growing "Current Web Links Of Interest" document. My inclination is to publish it as is, with everything. Our readers are smart. Then can choose what to look at. There are simply too many things to possibly look at these days. I am overwhelmed with this solution seeking, the comment thread issue put me over the line, and I cannot keep up, so I cannot look at all of these links you provided right now. Sorry. Thanks again.
One of Mary-Ann's criticisms was that there's already a lot of info. within the posts you've made since launching this project.
I'm currently paused in the middle of your third installment, the one with all the links.
Like I said I would, I'm going through, methodically, in trying to digest what you've shared, which also means sequentially. (That CIA dot gov share is going to take me a while. Now I know who Aldo Moro was and why he was offed. I refuse to download the 169-page PDF book, though...just waiting till I've finished reading it before deciding about saving or not.)
I think that adding to your substack visitors' reading load with jam-packed postings would be a mistake, at this point, unless there's also a certain amount of site-wide reorganization of the material within categories. Reorganization would potentially draw people based on interest because they would see where to look.
Everything coming at once is a lot like encountering a solid-block paragraph. Some readers aren't even going to bother trying to penetrate the text and then also try to comprehend what's being stated. And everything spread across multiple postings discourages readers from trying to glean what's most important--they'd have to do what I'm doing, which is going to take weeks.
Of course, when I say "site-wide," I realize this isn't really a website.
Maybe there needs to be a repository for all this info. somewhere else?
You could link to such a repository from within your periodic posts.
Substack just went down for me right as I tried to Post a reply to your comment. I should have saved it. Interesting coincidence. I got a Gateway Time Out Error and then could not reach Substack for a few minutes. Now I keep getting a "Something went wrong" Substack error when trying to post the reply.
This is a great comment. Thank you. Right now I am working on the next publication.
"Where Do We Go From Here? - An Invitation To Solution Seeking Substack To PartiCipate in Self Reflection, Discuss What Has Happened So Far, Learn, Adapt, Improve, Plan, Set Goals, Etc."
Being swamped busy, I have attempted to include the idea of a repository there in a list of discussion topics as follows:
"
1. What are our successes?
2. What are our learning opportunities (mistakes, challenges, failures, etc.)? How might we adapt to these learning opportunities and improve (how can we improve readability and participation, do we need a repository, do we need time stamped historical repositories, etc.) ?
"
Perhaps it is best to include it there, so it can be included in a broader contextual discussion?
My hope is to publish the next Substack article in a few hours. Some urgent chores need to be done first, I have invited others to provide edits, but I think it needs to be published soon, do my best, with all the inevitable writing flaws. I would much rather be participating like you then stumbling trying to facilitate and participate.
A SUGGESTION
Perhaps we can work together to analyze this and select the best possible new word, acronym, or short phrase (etc) for the concept of Wwenemy? Perhaps we can publish this as a group? As a group maybe we can work together to make sure the publication is well written and quit relying on me to try to do that myself? The publication could include the best word, phrase, acronym, etc. that we select, an overall short definition we discuss, and, also, the personalized definitions submitted by people who want to contribute their interpretation of the definition (with or without their names, as per their wishes)? One of the goals of Solution Seeking is to present full range discussions of all solutions, so why not do something similar with the new definitions we create? This might also help us to learn how to work together to accomplish goals?
In discussions with a lot of people with a lot of different opinions... this usually works:
"We are in a war. So far, only one side is killing, while the other is talking about it.
The sides are Tyranny vs WeThePeople. Choose a side."
I agree. Please note how some showed up on Solution Seeking temporarily, made this naming a big deal, got us off track, and then were never heard from again... There are many possible explanations for that. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I do not intend to get suckered into that kind of thing again. It is a diversion, and, compared to the root cause analysis we are attempting here, a complete waste of time in my opinion. Note how, in the latest Web Links of Interest comments, two are now fighting over His Story, over topics that are of relatively insignificant meaning and relevance compared to what I think should be our immediate goal: HOW do we stop our root cause enemy from harming humanity and the planet. We have had trollling and diversion along perverse feminist lines such that female Solution Seeking participants said that either I censor and ban the trolls of they would quit. We have had hints of religious divide and conquer, including the US Christian arrogance and ultimately detracting from real solutions because GOD IS GOING TO SOLVE IT FOR US IF WE HAVE FAITH. These types of challenges have plagued us in the past. How do we learn from that and avoid them going forward, concentrating on what needs to be done?
Further, one idea I like some times, and don't like other times, follows. Our enemy almost certainly has plans for divide and conquer going forward, it is the master of manipulation and getting people to fall for divide and conquer to distract them from the knowledge that their real root cause enemy is Warren Buffet's class and above with the puppets they install to run most or all institutions and countries on this planet. Simply, the idea is to leverage off the right timing, and turn the enemy's planned 99-split (where 99% roughly are split by the enemy to fight each other) into 99-1 (where the 99% realize what their root cause enemy is, hate its guts with a passion, and decide to destroy it without prejudice). This is in response to your comment about the sides: "The sides are Tyranny vs WeThePeople. Choose a side.". Can we work together or otherwise create one or more publications that go viral and move towards 99-1. Especially in the militaries and intelligence agency rank and file (forget about the cowardly immoral selfish enemy dick sucking leaders there). Take the militaries and we can win. Leave the militaries and the enemy has a powerful trump card it can deal from the back of the pack to destroy us anytime it chooses.
Are these ideas of mine valid? If so, how to work towards making them viral, as soon as possible?
That is basically what I just replied to his other comment and have always said , spiritual people are afraid to even say this .
The second I saw your word "wwenemy," I thought of it as the acronym for "world-weaponomic enemy."
For what it's worth.
Amazing. I like how there are two w's in a row. Wenemy was already taken apparently. Is there a better word?
No...yours is good.
I was afraid of that.
Maybe this short video can be used as a microcosm? Some may want to watch the whole thing. For me, this has meaning in these times.
https://youtu.be/93PBNHXXWWs?t=288
"A world without human beings has no center to it."
Absolutely.
Whereas, the wwenemy doesn't even belong on this planet, to begin with.
Agreed. Let's look at all possible ways to solve this, publish them along with their pros and cons, and figure out the best way to solve this problem, together, as diverse equal partners?
Please see the pinned comment and addendum. Thank you.
I have been discussing our challenges with several people. And I must apologize. The process we demonstrate here is perhaps as or more important than the solutions we are hoping to analyze, critique, derive, and present? People no longer know how to seek solutions. The cabal Wenemy is adapt at engineering conflict and placing its double agent leaders on both sides. Blind order following along with well crafted propaganda is used to seed the conflicts. If we can demonstrate that we can use a solution seeking process to achieve the best possible understanding of a wide range of views, show by example, that may help others to see through the nightmares their puppet commanders are leading them into and work out their own best solutions themselves. We cannot possibly anticipate every situation, though I think we should try to cover as wide a spectrum of solutions as possible. Our process will be clearly available online to all who want to see how it works. I am not saying that the journey is more important than the destination, but it is important. Now I will try to figure out how to describe the process that worked for me all those years ago in ways that might work for us. Again, I think we should put a strict, short time limit on this and start with the word and definition. I am perfectly happy to submit start it off by doing my best to give my best guess of the pros and cons of Wenemy and Cabal if that is what it takes. Along with the suggest process we use. Start simple. Work out the kinks in the process. Then apply it to the bigger challenge?
https://www.faena.com/aleph/ithaka-a-poem-reminds-us-that-the-journey-is-more-important-than-the-destination-0
I think it's useful to mess with the phraseology favored by the dominant narrative.
For instance, "Sustainable Development."
What a sick joke. As being implemented (or proposed to be implemented), it is really sustained dedevelopment.
Great idea. How about.... Sustainable Enslavement. Sustainable poverty. Sustainable poisoning. Etc. Great Reset = Slave Reset. Rockefeller 2010 document Clever Together = Conned Forever. Maybe we make a post to invite these kinds of things?
For the few days I've been around here, I am concerned over what my brain perceives as continual fracturing into potentially endless rabbit holes. New word?? Is this REALLY needed to fight this war?? And how do you even Pronounce WWEnemy?? As if stuttering?
I am also concerned about the format you've chosen because you have a growing list of documents, no one has time to read them all (and some contain reiterations and restatements), and since they exist in a timeline string, it's not easy to decide which to read. And as the list grows, now visitors will be scrolling through dozens and more of titles of documents, and .... it just seems like a disorganized mess. Unfortunately, I do not have a solution for this to suggest. For someone who is "not a writer," you are very prolific and I don't see how any working person can keep up.
I'm sorry that this was more a critique without suggestions, but this is what I see so far, FWIW.
Thank you for your valuable criticisms. Criticisms are often the best learning opportunities.
I will offer some thoughts.
1. The New Word is an attempt to avoid the endless meaningless discussions about who the root cause enemy is. I really think we need a new word for that and that was my best guess. I myself do not like it very much. Our Wwenemy invents clever new words all the time. Those new words serve it well. Wwenemy (Wenemy) is an attempt to streamline the think tank process going forward and avoid the frustration endless discussions referenced in the article. If you have an idea of an existing word that will accomplish this, please share. If you have a new idea about a better new word that describes the Wwenemy, please share it. I put the Ww at the front to purposely violate the enemy's linguistic rules and to make it unique, Wenemy was already taken, but it is apparently not common. But I like how Wenemy looks better. Maybe W-w-enemy or something similar?
2. This is the preliminary brainstorming and getting to know people phase. The rabbit holes appear to be an organic part of that. Some people have shared some very useful parts of themselves. My experience is that we did this kind of thing, but in person, at the beginning stages of my successful engineering projects and it worked. I did expect your kinds of valid criticisms.
3. In the engineering think tanks, some people decided that the process was not for them, but they stayed involved as observers. Others wanted to participate. Others left and formed their own groups. I realize it is premature to try to define thesethings here, as this is very different, but perhaps we can find best ways to adapt this to all people who want to be involved. We may decide to split into different groups with different flavors and support each other. Maybe you and/or others could potentially facilitate those groups in your own Substack(s)?
4. At the preliminary brainstorming stage in our ultimately successful engineering think tank projects, others said things very similar to what you have said about the messiness, the rabbit holes, the overwhelming information, etc. The following is a simplification and not striclly accurate, but it is the best I can come up with now.... Generally the Observers split off into different groups and the think tank Participants proceeded. Eventually, through analysis of all the options, the choices concentrated on because clearer, and the solutions formulated. But there were times when we wondered if it would succeed. This project here is the only of its type I am aware of on the planet. It may fail and need to be re designed and attempted in another way. But, even if that happens, the failure offers learning opportunities.
5. You are correct. I cannot keep up. Soon we will need to find ways of sharing the load or splitting. Today I got a frightening email from Substack... CONGRATULATIONS, YOU HAVE OVER 100 SUBSCRIBERS. I am surprised and apprehensive. The email continued.... OFTEN ALL IT TAKES IS ONE POST OR ONE SHARE TO GROW THAT TO THOUSANDS. The optimum size for our engineering groups was 4-7 people. But, at the preliminary brainstorming stage, we often had much more. But we did not have over 100.
6. Initially, before launching this think tank attempt, I was impressed with the quality of articles, writers, and commenters on Substack. But Substack is not designed for this. There are already sporadic, confusing, and suspicious errors that often put replies to comments in the wrong places, adding to the types of frustrations you correctly point out. It is not very likely this think tank approach cannot work on Substack, as referenced in some of the other articles.
7. This problem IS challenging. It is the most challenging thing I have ever faced. It might turn out to be impossibly challenging, but some will probably stick with it. Others probably won't. If you decide to leave, we have still created win/win? You have read the ideas here and have ideas about how to do it better. That is important.
8. I cannot thank you enough. Many here are very polite, and that is great. But we will need to all offer the kinds of meaningful, well thought out, respectfully presented, and easy to understand types of constructive criticisms you offer. I have a lot of favorite comments so far, and your comment is one of my favorites, is so very important for us, especially at this time.
I hope you reply. The numbers above are another hold over from the engineering think tank days. I wonder if Substack will put this reply in the right place this time...
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
Just a clarification: Cabal is a widely-understood and often-used term, but others in current usage include Elites, Non-elected bureaucrats, Globalists, Black Hats, Satanists, and still sometimes Illuminati. I'm sure I missed some. :) I like Remarque88's term, "the Money-Magic Families." So descriptive because these people are the Babylonian Money Magic creators. Of course, I still like the term from Alaje the Pleiadian, "Evil Earth Controllers." That one has a special place in my <3
This is what we need at this time. Thank you.
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
I like Cabal because it's already well-known, states concisely how these hidden people operate, is easily pronounced, doesn't require the populace we hope to reach learning new difficult words, etc. Why not use what is already available in this case? "Illuminati" was the operative word for 25 years, then the Community decided to stop using that word because these people are no where near "enlightened beings." Cabal really sums up how they operate.
Hi, Mary-Ann:
I've noticed some people get triggered by the word "cabal." Hard to guess why in all instances.
The Synthetic Left seem to be triggered by almost anything that does not fit within a very tightly proscribed range of preapproved subjects, so the mere mention of what's really going on around all of us, let alone exploring the true intentions behind what that is, probably is not going to register, regardless of the terms used. In which case--one could argue--introducing a new term might actually pique curiosity.
I don't know much about how the Right operates. When I quit the so-called Left or anything to do with Leftish politics, it was because of how the Synthetic Left went completely Gestapo, especially during the initial phases of the COVID project. But I didn't go Right, in response. (I've never been categorizable within what I consider to be the duopoly's non-choices, to begin with.)
I can guess how the Synthetic Left might react to certain things, because there are so many in my family and among former colleagues and I'm familiar with where they're coming from. In my opinion, their reactions are predictable, at least to a degree.
To my way of thinking, the word "cabal" has taken on a sort of teflon coating. And it has lost much of its meaning or power. And although I haven't seen it listed as a prohibited term in specific contexts, I was watching an alternative media podcaster, not long ago, who demeaned the use of the term, making it sound like it equates with shadowy, unprovable conspiracy arguments. Obviously, there are those who think that way about a lot of terms, besides "cabal." But this reminds me that there is resistance to the term.
On the other hand, I'm not explicitly advocating for "wwenemy" (or variations of that concocted new word) as the best alternative to "cabal." This discussion has barely started. We've not really taken the conversation very far, yet.
But since you brought up the word, I wanted to add that I would agree "cabal" has lost whatever power it may once have had.
As you suggest, "cabal" may sum up HOW "they" operate, and at least in a sense I would agree that is true. But it really doesn't identify WHAT their intentions are for us. It makes it sound like "they" are off in the distance doing this mostly unnamed thing and in a really shady sort of way.
It doesn't help us unmask WHO "they" are.
NB: Before typing my response, here, and hitting "Post," your comment had been shifted all the way to the bottom, essentially out of sight. I have no idea if your comment, along with my reply to it, will stay down here. If you're not already aware of the extent of the problem with comment threads mis-nesting (or failing to nest at all, sending lone comments anywhere on the page but where they belong), you might want to have a look at Larry's pinned comment associated with this related posting of his: https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/challenging-suspicious-substack-errors/comments
[COMMENT RESPOND TO Mary-Ann: "I like Cabal because" made Jan 17 2023 9:16 PM US Pacific time]
I can see both sides of this and have been on both sides. This is how a think tank works. These things are discussed. The participants understand each other's perspectives. If we cannot make a consensus, we adapt as well as possible. If some decide to use a new word, and others decide to use an existing word, my best guess right now is that we should enhance our credibility by working together to make a publication that shows all sides. Really, presenting all possible reasonable ways of how to stop the cabal or Wenemy from continuing to escalate its class war against humanity and all life on the planet is my best guess at what this group should be prioritizing, and soon. Proceeding with the discussions and then writing a full spectrum article about what words could be used to describe the cabal - Wenemy might be good formative practice for us, and a chance for us to get to know each other better, and a chance for us to define and meet goals?
This is the type of comment that often goes to the wrong place. That is why I put the brackets in on the top. Let's see where it goes...
A few minutes after sending, this comment appears to be in the right place, so far. The time now is 9:24 PM US Pacific Time.
Note that the Substack comment reply error just happened again. Monday Jan. 18, 8:27 PM US Pacific time.
I just replied to Mary-Ann. Her message was:
"
In my truther circle, we generally use "Cabal."
".
My reply was:
"
Thanks. Do you think that using "Cabal" is better for us here in Solution Seeking than using "Wwenemy"? If so, why? If not, why? Thanks again.
"
For a few seconds, my reply was in the right place, in the tree under her parent comment. Then my screen blinked, and my reply got put in the wrong place.
I just used "Save As PDF" to save this entire file for future reference. It is clear. Some of my almost identical comments are in the right place, and some are in the wrong place.
Larry ~ What a great read. You are a very thorough gentleman, indeed! Knowing you this short time but through your very personal writings, I was confident to share my thoughts without fear that you'd have a bad response. You did not disappoint. I am fairly new to Substack, I think I have 3 subscriptions. I didn't think about the size of the group, but your observation regarding the "congrats" email you got was right on. My mind went, "100 ...." Yeah, it's hard enough to have a discussion with 6 or 9 people.
Regarding the idea that you've stated before of certain kinds or reasons of 'splitting off' and maybe 'sharing' ... I just don't know what to say. Makes me think of "cells" they'd talk about regarding certain organizations, or even of how Anon is 'structured'. At that point, you go from the father of a thing to its grandfather, and then you go off and do ... what? Create another seed project which others splinter off from yet again? I mean, as I write this, I am trying to define your true purpose, beyond the stated one of trying to help the planet and people from getting destroyed (heavily paraphrased - I'm actually late for bed! lol)
Well, it is true that once a creator breathes life into a creation, they lose all control of it. :D
I MUST say goodnight at this moment. Thanks
Your comments are kind, relevant, and powerful. They challenge us/me in meaningful ways. Thank you so much. Please bear with me, I am tired, but feel compelled to write this, doing my best. These challenges like yours are needed. I cannot settle on guidelines. There are so many possibilities. My hope was to freeze this at where it was a few days ago, give the comments a chance, and then figure out where to go. Then I got a comment that was complex, but to me it kind of singled out Jews as the root cause. That is what finally got me, out of frustration, to try to streamline it and focus it by putting my best attempt at a new word to describe our root cause enemy. Both the definition and word I hurriedly chose are in need of improvement? Please help us come up with a better word, even if it is WENEMY, and we live with the small ambiguity and fact it is already kind of taken? I do think we need a new word suggestion for the root cause, one that is unique, non ambiguous, and clearly defined, so we can save ourselves this trouble or endless run arounds. It is curious that nobody else has come up with that word, at least not to my knowledge. We have brainstormed goals. That needs to be refined. There are many kinds of goals. I have very different ideas compared to others. We could rough in a framework for what lies ahead after the goals, which might split the group, which might be good.. Present a lawful suggestion of the range and classes of solutions, from the most passive and peaceful solutions, to the most aggressive and non lawful solutions, but be careful to discuss them lawfully. Novels are written about unlawful things, movies are made about them, they are discussed, and we will only discuss them in a lawful manner here, hoping that discussion shows that they should be avoided. It that discussion reveals they are needed, we have a problem. I have done this with myself and know that my analysis is incomplete and flawed. I am still struggling with how to lawfully discuss the unlawful solutions. Many are frustrated with the way the world is going and might make some comments here in ways that might cause them a lot of trouble. Before going on I want to work with others to do our best to avoid that kind of thing. I am not at all comfortable with what very crude guidelines in this area that I have offered so far. And there are risks. Some much smarter than me in law, political science, etc. tell me things like: "COVID validated beyond a doubt that there is no rule of law anymore. Assange is in jail forever for exposing the truth and possibly making mistakes with women that he shouldn't have made while NSA head Clapper lied several times under oath and, as far as I know, faced no actions." I am willing to take the risks myself if we can discover smart ways to do it that are effective and worth it. Intuition tells me that the answers to this will require a courageous exploration of all options, with the stated goal of never doing anything unlawful online here, never inciting violence, never planning violence, not falling for entrapment or other traps set by Wenemy agents, but discussing the entire range, simulating them, comparing them, discussing and learning of all the pros and cons, and then professionally publishing it in the best strategic ways after extensive group edits, written by the best writers we have, so the quality is exceptional. Time is short, when do we start moving on this? There is a lot of material, so maybe we stall here and give ourselves a chance to learn, share, trade comments, get to know each other, etc., and then proceed in the best possible ways? I am tired too and hope I am not going around in circles too badly. Sweet dreams. Thanks again. I hope you will stay and help us. We could really use your help.
Please see the pinned comment and addendum. Thank you.
Our time here may be coming to a close. Please take a look at the following and, if possible, share your thoughts in comments there. This is complex enough without this kind of possible sabotage. I have asked them to share their source code because, as a programmer, I cannot see how this is possible without malice, with one exception... Maybe somebody else does that coding for them and they just installed an upgrade? Either way, I invite them to share. Why would this kind of thing be happening if we weren't onto something here? Or is there another explanation?
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/challenging-suspicious-substack-errors
It might not be malice. This would be extremely mild or low-level malice, if that's what it was. Likely, it's that substack is a relatively new platform and may have bugs. That's normal. We have enough to be 'paranoid' about, without beating the sheets looking for more -- eh? :D
Maybe we shall see? I asked Substack for their source code. I would love to see how this is possible if it is not being done maliciously, and being done only to us, and only some of the time? A coding error should occur all of the time and to everybody. I have coded for years, run countless complex tree based software programs, programmed them myself, and this smells of malice.
Here is one of many rabbit holes this opened. I have expanded the fragmented comments, saved them, and backed them up. If it happens to you, where you make a reply, and then it goes to the wrong place, you will see for yourself. We have never seen anything like this anywhere else. And, it was working fine at first, and does not occur in any other sub stacks, just ours. It appears to be getting worse. If it goes away, that would be good, but strange.
Several others have validated this, as discussed here, and elsewhere.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/did-world-war-1-end-due-to-military/comment/11993692
Maybe try an experiment? Try making a comment to the thread above, clicking Return To Thread, and see if it happens to you. Can you find your comment? Is it where is should be? If it doesn't happen, try finding other comments of yours after you make them. You may be treated to having the comment appear on the screen in the right place, the screen flickering later, and the comment then going to the wrong place. Or maybe, for some reason, it just won't happen to you, and that is also, from a programmer's point of view, very strange, and indicates possible malice.
Hello Mary-Ann. I am going through and archiving of the posts, manually expanding the comments and archiving them, and I though that you might want to try jumping right to the solution and sharing with us?
Please take a look at this suggestion if you haven't already? I would love to read your reply to it.
An Open Invitation For Readers To Use Their Visualization And Creative Writing Skills To Solve The World's Problems
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/an-open-invitation-for-readers-to
Thank you.
Wwenemy works for me too. I think i will pronounce it:” wuh-wenemy”
Good suggestions. I some ways, even though the Urban Dictionary indicated WENEMY is taken, I prefer it. Maybe we just always capitalize it to distinguish it? WWENEMY? WENEMY? Maybe a linguistic wizard will come up with something better in a timely manner? And the definition I quickly put out there? Maybe getting that correct is equally or more important. Discussion and suggestions are valuable, even with the growing frequency of the confusing Substack reply placement errors. Can't wait to see where Substack places this comment...
At this time, so far, this comment is in the right place.
Maybe a term. EG. "RCWW Enemy." Root cause world wide enemy? WW Enemy?
I think we are complicating our intentions, unnecessarily. Just my humble opinion.
Do not forget that if we develop a new term, we will have to Teach it and Spread it, and is that not time better spent elsewhere??
Thank you for clearly stating your valuable thoughts. A good think tank explores all options. I view this possible definition selection or otherwise as team building and practice for what lies ahead. Hopefully we do not spend a lot of time on it, and we get our best guess out there, containing all reasonable view points, and all reasonable options, soon. I may be different, but if I read a well written summary of an attempt like this, complete with opposing views, and some options, the group doing that would gain credibility in my eyes. Remember some of the old, now obsolete, and extinct, new debates, where they would have real debates on opposing viewpoints? Where did that go? I really miss that.
Further to my last comment, my hope is that we could complete this very soon, and get onto the more important tasks. I submit that we should not allow this, or anything else, to slow us down. The word debate should be over with and published in a maybe a few days, a week at the most? If we can't do that, how will we possibly present a similar thing containing all possible viable solutions to the world's problems? The odds are that lofty goal fails. Hopefully Solution Seeking continues in other ways. If people just start thinking "boy, maybe we should be seeking solutions", it would be a pleasant surprise. I have many things that got put on hold to try to launch this and they need my attention, so I cannot continue to spend the hours on this that I am spending now. For me, this word exercise is an attempt to see if this group is capable of the larger solution seeking I seek, or if it wants to do other things. The comment thread issue is a potentially debilitating blow to all of this and may destroy this group. If so, it is not a total failure. I really hope we can fully honor, understand, and represent your views as we go forward. Time will tell...
If you are not familiar with Remarque88, consider this latest video of his. He does excellent work and almost always gets things framed 'just right'. I don't offer this so much as an example, but rather, I really want you and the other members to hear what he is saying here. This could be very excellent news, if it holds. https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RmLLgWUx1FQ/?list=notifications&randomize=false
Thanks for the video. There is another interpretation I would like to share...
Here is the 2010 Rockefeller document that discusses Lock Step. Many refer to it as the Lock Step document.
https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf
But, when I read it, to me, the preferred scenario is not Lock Step, but Clever Together. One of my many interpretations follows... Perhaps they used COVID to get the majority jabbed, and everybody busy concentrating on other things. They put quantum dots in everything so everybody has their nano technology growing inside. They plan to turn the visible prison of Lock Step into a more powerful but invisible prison of Clever Together. It is possible they will sacrifice the useful idiot minions like the Free Masons, maybe even some of the royalty. After all, as Bezmenov said, they know too much. Once the undisclosed unaudited entity that controls the world has got its SCADA wireless control over all the SCADA slaves, it might not need its upper level minions anymore, and may destroy them. The worst prisons are invisible prisons. And the worst slaves are those who have been successfully fooled into thinking they have won? The 5G+ continues to roll out. The quantum dot and nano tech mutations continue to spread through all life on the planet? And we still don't know what is at the very top of the cabal's command chain? The cabal now allows its inbred inferior anti-elites to show how despicable and stupid they are for all to see, possibly in preparation to sacrifice them? There are reports that 50% of the Davos clown puppets did not show up. I heard supposed inner circle (swearing to privacy as to source) stories that the cabal planned to sacrifice royalty, and that might include King Charles, who was quite vocal when COVID first hit, but has been much more silent since. I also heard unsubstantiated rumors that King Charles and his interests control Substack. So I mention that here in an effort to potentially divide and conquer near the top of the cabal's 1%. Might as well give it a shot?
Thanks again for the video.
My 5 cents on definition, which is important.
Powerseeking or powerweilding
Elected or unelected
Ideologically-motivated or politically-motivated
Domestic or foreign
. Secret or in plain sight
Of sufficient or undue influence on policy
as it affects human rights of all kinds
Relies on new, or falsely re-defined notions of scientific validation
Relies on censorship, spin, or silent ignorance of the truth
Relies on becoming the voice of government mantra,
Is characterized by repeated slogans like “ build bak better” or “safe and effective”which indicates propaganda
Geez i sound like JFK
Gladly im too unimportant to be killed by the CIA/Swamp.
I love it. Thank you. Your great suggestion also sparked an idea, I think I will make a pinned comment out of it...
A SUGGESTION
Perhaps we work together to analyze this and select the best possible new word, acronym, or short phrase (etc) for the concept of Wwenemy? Perhaps we publish this as a group? As a group we work together to make sure the publication is well written and quit relying on me to do that myself? The publication could include the best word, phrase, acronym, etc. that we select, an overall short definition we discuss and agree upon, and, also, the personalized definitions submitted by people who want to contribute their interpretation of the definition (with or without their names, as per their wishes)? One of the goals of Solution Seeking is to present full range discussions of all solutions, so why not do something similar with the new definitions we create?
Continue on Sstack for now…gather ideas. Take on roles/tasks by volunteer and its a go. The Kiss principle serves well usually… and having a few named trios of writers may make the think tank function well.
Thank you!!
Hi Brek - I do appreciate your points, but since this is a solutions site, I don't expect to see many Lefties here. You might be the exception. I just can't agree on inventing a new word. I know there are a lot of supposed "truthers" who just like to attack stuff, call names, etc. I ignore these people. I don't know of ANYONE using Any other term besides "Cabal" these days. No teflon coating to it for 'us'. They ARE shadowy people, but I can name many of them. In fact, it is very well known who many of them are; and despite varying last names such as Schwab, Clinton, Podesta, Zuckerberg, and so many others, they are mainly Rockefellers or Rothschilds. It's possible there are some above even these "elite" people whose names are less well-known, but a great number of Cabal higher-ups are definitely identified. It's their Minions, who are in greater numbers, that are not all known individually, but many of them can be discerned by their speech and actions. Thanks for the comment.
[reply to Mary-Ann comment "Hi Brek - I do appreciate you..." sent 9:48 PM US Pacific Time Jan 172023]
Hi Mary Ann. I just took a look at your last comment. These are great think tank like discussions. I see the points on all sides.
Can you please take a look at the placement of your comment in the URL below? Is your comment placed where it should be? To me, it looks like it might be on the wrong tree. I would have expected it under Brek's comment, but for me, that is not where it is showing up now.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/wwenemy-suggested-explicit-and-unique/comments#comment-11996672
I recommend sorting by all three options:
1. New First
2. Top First
3. Chronological.
Thanks.
Hi, again, Mary-Ann:
My point about a teflon coating is whether the term in question, "cabal," sticks to the intended target.
I would contend that it does not, at this point, serve that purpose.
It is in that regard I meant the term "cabal" has become teflon coated. Slides right off the target.
The word "cabal" might still resonate with the discussion group(s) you're referring to who are sorting out how the "they" that we're also talking about here (a.k.a., the "cabal") operate. In which case, how the term resonates within a discussion group would point more to an internal function.
But does the term stick to the intended target? Or does it even begin to show us what is really going on, at what are mostly unseen levels (unseen by us)?
(Above the upper-mid-level puppets you listed--I would contend--are literal trillionaires and multi-trillionaire families. They are hiding. And who they are might also be a good question for us all to try to at least allow for.)
We need something, in my opinion, that is more functional at unmasking. But I'm also not trying to change the minds of anyone already wedded to a term.
I have been discussing our challenges with several people. And I must apologize. The process we demonstrate here is perhaps as or more important than the solutions we are hoping to analyze, critique, derive, and present? People no longer know how to seek solutions. The cabal Wenemy is adapt at engineering conflict and placing its double agent leaders on both sides. Blind order following along with well crafted propaganda is used to seed the conflicts. If we can demonstrate that we can use a solution seeking process to achieve the best possible understanding of a wide range of views, show by example, that may help others to see through the nightmares their puppet commanders are leading them into and work out their own best solutions themselves. We cannot possibly anticipate every situation, though I think we should try to cover as wide a spectrum of solutions as possible. Our process will be clearly available online to all who want to see how it works. I am not saying that the journey is more important than the destination, but it is important. Now I will try to figure out how to describe the process that worked for me all those years ago in ways that might work for us. Again, I think we should put a strict, short time limit on this and start with the word and definition. I am perfectly happy to submit start it off by doing my best to give my best guess of the pros and cons of Wenemy and Cabal if that is what it takes. Along with the suggest process we use. Start simple. Work out the kinks in the process. Then apply it to the bigger challenge?
https://www.faena.com/aleph/ithaka-a-poem-reminds-us-that-the-journey-is-more-important-than-the-destination-0
Hi, this will be real quick because I have to get ready for work. I was not referring to one or more "discussion groups." I was referring to the entirety of the Truther community and the podcasters on Rumble, BitChute, YouTube, etc et alia.
I find this partially comical and partially *par for the course* with humans. They never get off the dime because they seem mentally unable to get past the small, unimportant *isht*, ever! I hold little hope for the human race. Anything that gets accomplished with respect to ridding the planet of the Bad Actors will probably require much off-world coaching and other assistance.
Have a great day.
[Edited several times]. Wow. Thank you. Deja vu. At times I share what might be similar frustrations. At other times I feel differently.
Noteworthy is that this is the only type of Solution Seeking attempt of this sort I have ever discovered anywhere on the planet. Is anybody aware of another at this time? Does anybody find that curious?
Many humans just fell for the lies. Others realized they were being lied to, but have chosen to gather information (can't ever have too many details), immerse in the fear porn, and follow their controlled opposition rock star of choice. Hardly anybody wants to seek real solutions to the global problems. Most don't even want to discuss solutions.
Daring to propose a discussion of this type of solution seeking got my comments banned on Banned.Video. A badge of honor and/or a pathetic failure? The controlled opposition rock stars, Igan, Jones, etc. do not seek these kinds of solutions. Isn't that kind of thing curious? Igan ignored my attempts to dialogue with him about this but has time for certain types of communication. I really like Igan and am in no way criticizing him, he is a very busy, intelligent, insightful, courageous and compassion human being. And he is an amazing guitarist, unique, one of the best ever. LinkedIn started censoring my attempts to seek these kinds of solutions and long term colleagues who used to excel in solution seeking decided to permanently cut all ties to me because I dared to use the word "cabal" and was therefore obviously a "conspiracy theorist". People have changed.
Another long time ex friend, very high IQ, PHD, able to do very advanced yoga, writing, and complex math with ease decades ago, warned me about nano tech being the greatest danger in human history in 1989. After COVID hit the same person (on the driver's license at least) told me that Snopes proved that COVID was what the authorities are saying and that I have deteriorated into a paranoid conspiracy theorist. I note that person has lived in extreme EMF conditions in an urban environment for decades. I could write a book about how people have changed. Some technical details are discussed here.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/enemy-emf-silent-weapons-for-quiet
I tried and failed to get real conversations about this type of solution seeking going with several in local freedom groups, freedom cells, etc. They seem to think that this will blow over or run out of steam before the cabal comes for them. They have their controlled opposition cookbooks and many have somehow acquired significant wealth and property since COVID hit while most of the rest of the population has suffered through worsening conditions. In a county where acreages are priced highly (out of the reach of most) and the cabal has made it almost impossible to develop your own land, one group magically somehow acquired a mansion on a nicely cultivated couple of acres at under half the going price. You have to love how things just "fall into place" for some who believe in things like "The Secret" and attract followers who will not engage in solution seeking but, rather, follow published guide books that tell them everything they need to know? While the people at the controlled opposition mansion are nice and may not realize any of this, they offer meeting space, skill shares, etc. But they offer no group sustainable farming, shelter for victims, sub acreages where victims can camp, etc. Maybe their CC&R's prohibit this.
I almost opened discussion about all these points but didn't. That discussion would have probably not gone well. They have a Discord Channel and I left that channel because of steady deterioration in their ability to engage in any kind of Solution Seeking. They even had a kind of carnival with a very famous controlled opposition rock star I will not name here. That rock star looked at me in fear and disgust when I brought up global solution seeking. What could be behind that?
No matter what happens in this challenging Substack Solution Seeking group, I am thankful for what has happened so far. For me, this is far, far better than anything else I have seen or tried in the past few years. I am not saying anything negative about the people I refer to in the freedom cells, freedom groups, etc. They are great people and I love them. My best guess is they have no idea and might be hurt if they read this. Solution Seeking is best done without ego involvement, looking at all valid reasonable viewpoints, discussing them all, and clearly publishing the pros, cons, and attributes of all of them. Sometimes a consensus is reached, sometimes it isn't. We will hopefully not present yet another confined narrow field cookbook like the many other versions already out there?
I would not worry so much about what you call "rock star" controlled opposition truthers, unless they are lying completely, their messages and info will get to those ready to hear it. Yes your correct about ego being very dangerous in this regard. I think Max I , is genuine and real and usually quite correct and blunt , A. J, for example regardless of what he is or is not has reached an enormous audience with lots of good info , usually ahead of most. I was talking and educating on all this before A.J. and even before David Icke who I have the greatest respect for. BEFORE people can get to SOLUTIONS in action , they have to really build a knowledge base yes , most are way behind the curve , but your seeing , Im seeing daily more and more are ready and in movement and action.
Great comments. Many pertinent points. Thanks. Yes, the broader the knowledge base, the better. But a good think tank might not need to wait for everybody to build that base, we will provide it for them in the dialogue and what we compare, innovate, join, and build. We can reference these excellent sources but, hopefully, we don't just accept one of their solutions and quit, thinking we are done. If that happens, in my mind, we will have failed, and the Wenemy will have somehow succeeded in destroying the positive potential of this group. It is already doing that extremely well, in covert, cowardly ways, and it will escalate if we persist and start getting close to the best solutions it wants to prevent us from discovering.
For those who are convinced they already know the best solution, please share it. For those who are unwilling to discuss other solutions, maybe this Solution Thinking think tank is not for you.
I am not worried about them. I support many of them and deeply admire them. Max I is one of my favorites. But, where is the discussion about multiple possible solutions to solve this? Why the endless useless guaranteed to fail strategies like FOLKS ARE WAKING UP, WE HAVE TO WAKE FOLKS UP? The vague WE MUST PUSH BACK, but then no engagement in discussion the wide range of HOW TO PUSH BACK? If we can learn to engage properly here in solution seeking, we might, together solve this. Nobody else is going to even try that. The Wenemy, cabal, or whatever has apparently succeeded in stalling this group. If that persists, I will adjust accordingly. If that persists, I advise others to consider doing their version of something similar. Learn from what happened in this group and improve upon it and solve this situation. We can never rely on any one person, one idea, one concept, one definition, one process, or we will likely fail like all the others have apparently failed. We need to innovate and come up with more alternatives, not just spit out previous models and put our faith in things we have little or no influence over? Sure, we can, and should examine all existing possibilities, the pros, the cons, try mixing them together, make up some new ones or sijmjilar ones, etc. Think tank, like what our Wenemy cabal does.
You are too smart to ask the question why are they not discussing SOLUTIONS ? We all must come to understanding what "we can or cant do and what is most productive," then if we are smart we are careful not to openly talk about it online until its safely in motion or done , we talk about it only with those involved and in person. SK
Yes!! Thanks. Greatly appreciated. There are probably ways to optimize what you discuss. We need to find them. Do as much as we can lawfully do online and set it up so others can put the final pieces in the jigsaw puzzle, or shuffle all the pieces and make a better solution? Provide a model of how solution seeking can work. Maybe starting with the simple task.... Cabal, Wenemy, or something else? If we can't dialogue about that and create a meaningful article covering all known relevant aspects of it together and work together to publish our results as an example of how online solution seeking can work, then I will not be spending nearly as much time on this Substack going forward, and I will concentrate on other things. If we fail, I will probably leave this Substack up as is and make infrequent posts and try to try to analyze why it failed.
I understand you perfectly. In some respects, I think we both see the writing already. This is just too unwieldy. I think I figured out the comments issue, though. This site functions with an older style of presenting a thread. Therefore, one has a growing number of faint lines going down the left-hand side. This is also unwieldy, but if you want to know what reply goes to what original comment, you have to count and keep track of the lines, then follow it up to where it 'hooks' to. Like anyone is really going to do that, ROFL. :D
Yes. Yes yes yes oh sorry, lol :D Alex Jones' videos and podcasts were important to my early learning, for sure. No one who saw the Bohemian Grove video will ever forget it without intentionally slamming the door (to their mind) shut. I also loved the videos of him confronting limo-ensconced monsters arriving to "world" meetings like Davos. David Icke is an institution and another important source of information, over the years, on his focused range of topics -- exactly the ones this group proposes to grapple with. I listened to Max I frequently in the 2020s and then felt the inkling to stop. Not meaning to say anything negative about him with that, it's just what happened and I didn't analyze it. But I am STUNNED by your statement that you were "talking and educating on all this before AJ and... David Icke." MY GOD, MAN! Did you have clearances? Were you a user of the pre-civilian internet? At least, you must have (had) amazing contacts.... Remote viewing? You have me completely intrigued! :D
No I simply had the vision to see the future at a very young age , supported by a mother who understood much of this , this may sound strange but I remembered that this would be in my lifetime and I would be involved in doing something about it, because I also remembered attempting to do so in the 18th century when much of this was planned and launched it really goes that much farther back. , I was not very successful then. When in my teenage years , I began to seriously study in depth many such things , even into a very esoteric level, I saw a movie made by Gene Roddenberry of Star Trek fame , he made a pilot movie for a series he wanted to make called SPECTER , it showed all this very clearly , including the demonic and Reptilian aspect. I had huge downloads of info that this was indeed the case long before David I , wrote anything. His series was of course canceled , but you can find this movie , and it may be on the net as well. Then the contact with others who knew this stuff and many mentors filled in the rest. I would then find the information and evidence was everywhere, PARTICULARLY in the Vatican/Jesuit/Freemasonic structures, as well as my studies of ancient advanced civilizations and lost tech. There is much more but that will give some clues. Because of all this starting at a very young age , I have stayed out of this entrapping system and lived off grid my entire adult life.
Haha. No clearance. No remote viewing. I knew people who disclosed confidential cabal information information and I promised never to reveal their names or the details. Suffice to say I was highly skeptical. While I was skeptical of what they said, through the years, it continued to add up. In my undergraduate engineering years I noted that some of the Maxwell EMF equations that were in my dad's early 1900's physics text were not in what they were teaching us. My prof had never seen the equations before and thought they were excluded because they were probably proven wrong. Research at the library indicated otherwise. Then in my PHD chasing years (before I woke up and got out with some of my sanity and a master's) I encountered some strange things in the advanced mathematics used for continuum mechanics. The reactions of the faculty to my associated questions further tied it together. The skepticism grew. While keeping the confidences, I had long conversations with many friends much smarter than me about this. We looked at every conceivable option and explanation. Explanations like what Jones and Icke said years later were among the possibilities we came up with. We considered many different flavors of these things, all with a probability, none held as absolutely true. All have their strengths and weaknesses. Now those friends who used to love discussing things like this no longer have any use for those discussions, or for me. We discussed these things and came up with them independently. Years before I even knew of Jones and/or Icke. I found it very interesting to discover how Icke and Jones came up with it. It is somewhat similar to what I did.
For me, everything remains a probability in a sea of endless possibilities. I am amazed at those who have one belief system and think one model is correct and the other ones are wrong.
See the power of Solution Seeking?
See the power of a diverse team of well meaning people? We are all somewhat similar but also very different. We might be able to solve this.
I grew up with this attitude... Solution Seeking in the 1960's. Consideration of all alternatives until the best one is discovered. Let's find that third alternative? Not with a commander. But, as equal partners? I do not like any of the solutions I have seen so far. How about you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S-0vIBIp4Y&t=196s
Larry, regarding the person you knew in 1989 who had a brain then but doesn't now (and I will get to the post you've linked at https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/enemy-emf-silent-weapons-for-quiet), I want to jump in and add that I've noticed similar changes in people I've worked with during at least a decade and a half, in some cases longer, who were the type to "adopt early" when it came to the not-very-smart-to-be-using so-called 'smart'-phones. These people never questioned the EMF soup they were living in, as a result. (I am "living in," as well, of course, because there's no escape for most of us, even when we've limited/eliminated/never even "adopted" in the first place.)
That EMF soup will change you, over time. I've witnessed this in others AND how it has changed me, even though I avoid where possible. The effect is ratcheted up, incrementally, over time, but most don't feel it. I do.
A facile phrase during COVID-ClownWorld that I've heard has been the observation: "COVID broke a lot of people's brains." Because it did. This in-your-face, very-bad-to-be-using tech (tech that is so VERY in-your-face about how VERY bad it is to be using, that I believe we're being mocked by the whatever-nemy for our weaknesses) has been coupled with massively orchestrated propaganda, wiping away a chunk of humanity.
By "wiped away," I mean that they may be unreachable. I don't want to invest in that sort of dismissiveness. I want to hold out hope that they can be reached. But I'm seeing signs, like you've pointed out, that they're really not.
Brandon's latest post addresses this. I haven't even finished reading, but wanted to share this bit that stands out to me:
"Note, the C19 jabs are a neurotechnology backdoor into the human mind. It embeds 'cybernetic' material into the body and also electromagnetically hardens the body/mind over time, but removes slowly your control of your mind and motor cortex. The lower your body mass index (BMI) the quicker you are impacted by it. If you use EMF devices (smart phones, etc.) it assembles faster. "
https://brandoniglesias.substack.com/p/c19-global-vaccination-spiked-a-seriously
That's essentially how I saw it during the COVID-ClownWorld rollout, but Brandon's coming from a much more technical viewpoint.
Excellent and agreed, as someone who has NEVER used a cell phone , or owned a TV and has lived off grid my entire adult life , I have a different perspective and have always been astonished that all these people cant SEE whats happening to them , and how they are being changed , addicted and dependent. I recently wrote a song about this called Digital Zombies, which is what they have or are becoming. Along with this is a very noticeable hostility toward anyone providing information to them about these dangers, and or refusing to use it all and become programmed for their own destruction.
I admire those rare people who had the intelligence and wisdom to avoid these EMF poison weapons. And I cannot claim to have been at all like that. I experienced the brain damage and other EMF issues as I was exposed for decades in my engineering, with a cell phone in my breat pocket, developing arrhythmia, and still not getting it despite being told. When I retired in 2016 I setup an electronics lab with wireless IoT devices everywhere, there was so much radiation that my wireless MIDI guitar did not work due to interference. They had not expected that level of interference from so many devices in their design. I have recovered to an extent, but I know first hand what this does to people, having gone through it myself. For whatever reasons, the CDS gave me an additional significant recovery, and I have not yet encountered any information about why that might be have happened. I can therefore understand some of why people go along with this wireless addiction, having done so myself. But I figured it out and adjusted. I have tried to share with people in ways that might get them to adjust like I did, have had some successes, but far too many failures. I realize they are adults and all I can do is my best, but I would really like to learn how to be more convincing.
I will apologize for my incomplete and misleading writing... The person I used to know changed. They are still intelligent, sharp, a leader in their field, and capable of some incredible things, as long as those things are things they are already proficient in. Anything different or new is challenging for them. They are much more conformist now and are adverse to taking risks that might expose their new challenges. They, like most, are now completely incapable of dealing with today's challenges, as predicted by EMF expert Dr. Martin Pall on page 17 of this document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cAgIsctzvtyTeNCXsOcWjirXUshmvx2X/view
They are also in denial and do not want to hear about it. A complete personality change.
The Brandon article is excellent. Did you know that he has joined us by subscribing to Solution Seeking? He is very busy with his development work so it is not clear how much he might participate.
But that form of so-called intelligence you refer to is, according to the way I look at things, "really, really stupid." If there's no soul left or the operating mode of the "intelligence" is to reinforce bankrupt approaches to life and to learning and contributes to further bankrupting the learning process for others, what has one got, there? Nothing that I want to have anything to do with.
There are PhDs in my family whom COVID has turned into drooling idiots. It is truly astounding to witness.
I see no reason to sugarcoat this aspect.
Good points. At times I feel like you do. At other times I feel differently.
We are at war with the cabal Wenemy? So far, the world's population has not done much to retaliate in this war, it is maybe more of a slaughter by the cabal Wenemy? All people are possible assets? What can be done to use all possible assets to strategic advantage (while understanding the attributes of the assets)? Is it not best to discuss assets with as much compassion as possible (a severe challenge for me at times)? Buffet's side of the class war has significantly harmed all of us, some to a greater extent than others? Should we not try to remind all who have been harmed of this fact in strategically optimized ways so those assets might realize who their real root cause enemies are and perhaps be motivated to consider doing the best things? Sorry, more questions than answers right now. But, perhaps that is a good thing?
My guess is that this comment is going to go off into nowhere land but I will send it anyhow. I note how this comment thing is having a significant negative impact on my engagement here and want to find a way of avoiding it, but I an no longer keep up with all of this, and I am doing it pretty much 24x7.
The conundrum of how to reach the seemingly unreachable is a new and even more challenging phenomenon under COVID than it ever was before, and for all the tech-related reasons touched on elsewhere in comments, here, not just because of the effect of weaponized propaganda (a.k.a., the narrative).
People are so broken that they're cutting themselves off even from POTENTIAL communication with those of us who are not yet zombified.
December 2020 was the last time I sent out holiday cards (also known as "Christmas" greetings). That was before the rollout of the killshots, and in my 2020 newsletter, included with the snail-mailed cards, I hadn't said anything about the promised (threatened) not-a-vaccine. All I did was point to a lot of questions that I had about how COVID was being (mis)handled.
Apparently that was all it took for one (now former) friend. She waited two years, and this December sent me what was closer to a "Dear John" letter than holiday wishes. In it, she said she was no longer teaching because she thought it wasn't a great idea to be around so many "unvaccinated" children, and that she was going to focus her energies on the other hands-on facet of her work.
Fine. It's her perfect right to do that. (Even though I find her anti-science and anti-children message about "vaccines" to be very troubling.) But the USPS stamp cancellation showed a different location than the address I have for her, and she included no return address label on the envelope.
It's that kind of weirdness...one could even say, underhandedness...that makes communication impossible with these people.
Sorry, I had to rush the last reply, did a few edits. Warm wishes for a meaningful, fun, and safe day.
This is me recently saying my piece to just one faction of the whatever-nemy:
(My 1/18/23 public comment to FDA via https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/forgotten-mission/ concerning FDA’s upcoming January 26, 2023 VRBPAC advisory committee meeting to discuss “the future [so-called] vaccination regimens addressing COVID-19”:)
"The injected-COVID-immune-compromise and/or injected-Adverse-Events COVID project shows all the signs of being a crime against humanity. The depopulation effect is of such massive proportions never before seen in world history as part of a so-called public health response that if the data coming in, during early 2021, weren't enough to convince authorities that the shots were killing and maiming people and should be stopped, the only conclusion can be that authorities were in on and aware of and okay with causing carnage.
"Previously respected or at least grudgingly tolerated institutions at the state, national and global levels have openly coordinated in a calculated and/or mutually coerced effort essentially to remove humanity from the planet. That is the clear effect of this state-sponsored event.
"There are not yet convincing signs that this COVID depopulation-by-injection effort is slowing down or stopping, even though more and more of the citizenry are waking up to what's happening.
"If officials at the FDA are concerned that they might not be forgiven for their malfeasance, they might wish to consider relocating to a different planet. This one--called Earth--belongs to us humans."
Well said. Thank you. Congratulations. Very impressive. I wish there were more hours in the day. I am keeping a LibreOffice document WEB LINKS OF INTEREST that I hope to publish in Substack Solution Seeking soon. I would like to put this on that list with your permission and guidance. Perhaps you would write a short summary of the website? Perhaps something like the start idea I give below (sorry I am rushing this, I am way behind in the Solution Seeking comments):
"Substack Solution Seeking Bret has created an excellent website ..."
Here is Stand for Health's "about" page:
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/about-us/
Here's their action page:
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/take-action/
It was because of Vera Sharav that I first learned about Stand for Health Freedom. (I joined in early December of 2020.) I can't easily locate (and do not recall) what her association with them may have been--official, unofficial, advisory, formerly any or all, or none of the above? But I do recall that she became a health freedom advocate, herself, after her son was killed by a prescription drug ill-suited for him or for his condition.
It's hard not to listen when a Holocaust survivor tells you that the authoritarianism we've been experiencing under the COVID project is the same as what was happening under Nazism or that had led to that historical set of crimes.
She has her own group: https://ahrp.org/vera-sharav/
I don't want to overwhelm you with more info. about this or any other sort of tangential aspect of the overarching issues, but just in case, here is Vera Sharav's more recent activism as it relates to COVID-ClownWorld:
https://rumble.com/v1gtl0n-vera-sharav-speech-at-nuremberg-75.html
26:48
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and human rights advocate, speaks first at the 75th Anniversary Event of the Nuremberg Code in Nuremberg, Germany, on August 20, 2022.
Full presentation via CHD:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/75th-commemoration-of-the-nuremberg-code
Thanks Brek. I just briefly looked at the first two links (some people are doing great work) and put your entire email into my growing "Current Web Links Of Interest" document. My inclination is to publish it as is, with everything. Our readers are smart. Then can choose what to look at. There are simply too many things to possibly look at these days. I am overwhelmed with this solution seeking, the comment thread issue put me over the line, and I cannot keep up, so I cannot look at all of these links you provided right now. Sorry. Thanks again.
One of Mary-Ann's criticisms was that there's already a lot of info. within the posts you've made since launching this project.
I'm currently paused in the middle of your third installment, the one with all the links.
Like I said I would, I'm going through, methodically, in trying to digest what you've shared, which also means sequentially. (That CIA dot gov share is going to take me a while. Now I know who Aldo Moro was and why he was offed. I refuse to download the 169-page PDF book, though...just waiting till I've finished reading it before deciding about saving or not.)
I think that adding to your substack visitors' reading load with jam-packed postings would be a mistake, at this point, unless there's also a certain amount of site-wide reorganization of the material within categories. Reorganization would potentially draw people based on interest because they would see where to look.
Everything coming at once is a lot like encountering a solid-block paragraph. Some readers aren't even going to bother trying to penetrate the text and then also try to comprehend what's being stated. And everything spread across multiple postings discourages readers from trying to glean what's most important--they'd have to do what I'm doing, which is going to take weeks.
Of course, when I say "site-wide," I realize this isn't really a website.
Maybe there needs to be a repository for all this info. somewhere else?
You could link to such a repository from within your periodic posts.
Substack just went down for me right as I tried to Post a reply to your comment. I should have saved it. Interesting coincidence. I got a Gateway Time Out Error and then could not reach Substack for a few minutes. Now I keep getting a "Something went wrong" Substack error when trying to post the reply.
This is a great comment. Thank you. Right now I am working on the next publication.
"Where Do We Go From Here? - An Invitation To Solution Seeking Substack To PartiCipate in Self Reflection, Discuss What Has Happened So Far, Learn, Adapt, Improve, Plan, Set Goals, Etc."
Being swamped busy, I have attempted to include the idea of a repository there in a list of discussion topics as follows:
"
1. What are our successes?
2. What are our learning opportunities (mistakes, challenges, failures, etc.)? How might we adapt to these learning opportunities and improve (how can we improve readability and participation, do we need a repository, do we need time stamped historical repositories, etc.) ?
"
Perhaps it is best to include it there, so it can be included in a broader contextual discussion?
My hope is to publish the next Substack article in a few hours. Some urgent chores need to be done first, I have invited others to provide edits, but I think it needs to be published soon, do my best, with all the inevitable writing flaws. I would much rather be participating like you then stumbling trying to facilitate and participate.
Thanks again.