A. ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE OF THE GROK POST PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE
I, and others, have asked other AI's to try to validate or dispute what GROK provided for this post. None have validated. Several have refuted, stating that the indices provided by GROK do not appear in the literature, and there are issues with how GROK derived those indices. None of the AI's were ready, willing, and able to investigate in more depth and validate or refute the ways GROK derived the indices. Note that correlation is not causality, so even if the GROK quantitative information is correct, more hard science is required to prove causation.. What is required to really validate or refute the trends GROK has uncovered is for unbiased human experts in the field of psychology to take the time to go through the references provided by GROK and the sample calculations done by GROK, and use their expertise to evaluate.
B. SOME REFERENCES OF INTEREST
Some references of interest are given below. Many other references appear in the user comments.
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety. Scientific & policy developments regarding the biological & health effects of electromagnetic radiation from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, electric vehicles & other wireless technology, including 5G. Website curated by Joel Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family & Community Health, UC Berkeley School of Public Health. https://www.saferemr.com/2018/04/EMR-Safety.html
Your experience seems to validate a rumor I have heard that Grok (maybe other AI?) may tell you what you want to hear. In other words, could, like the algorithms on YouTube, keep one in a perceived ideological bubble.
The EMF connection to people's very apparent loss of critical thinking skills is fascinating. Of course, there are other toxic burdens that might graph similarly alongside CT loss, therefore EMFs need not work alone against us.
I did the Anonymous question disclosed in my article partly to investigate the possibility that GROK is acting like an echo chamber just telling me what I want to hear. It might be partly true and GROK's responses and comparisons seem both reasonable and suspect. This is why I want to get my own NVIDIA Spark computer running so I can ensure things like this are not happening. You could also access GROK as an Anonymous user and see first hand for yourself how your answer compares. If you do that, it would be great if you shared that answer here.
Of course the enemy has hit us with many Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. The EMFs are one of many. Personal experience and confidences I will not violate have shown me first hand that, for me, the EMF contribution is significant, for me the EMF harm has eclipsed all other harm I know of. I have experienced the benefits of minimizing EMFs and the harm of being slammed with EMFs myself so I know first hand that, for me, the EMF factor is real. I also note how EMFs have effected friends, comparing the heavy cell phone urban people who live in high EMF environments with the lower EMF harmed people who live in more rural settings, comparing heavy cell phone users with moderate cell phone users, and the correlations for me are significant. It is complex and different for everybody. I invite you do look at your own situation with an open mind and share your thoughts.
If one answer is based on previous conversations, then what I get from this, ... is that AI feeds off the conversations it has with humans, ..... and remembers all of it. Can't be good.
By 2030 AI may be a witness against us in criminal court. Be careful what you ask it and doubly careful about conversations with it.
I hope you had some time to digest the Spartacus posts, ... it's really eye opening.
Good point. Thanks. I am aware of that. I stand by my posts. Let the chips fall where they may. Thanks for the posts. I have only been able to browse those posts so far and my schedule will not allow for more than that for a while.
This analysis dove tails with Glenn Becks analysis. Groc4 will give you answers to questions but education needs to teach "Critical Thinking Skills" to all ages. It does no good to have something that gives you answers and for people to sit by and just use AI to run their lives. We must be the creators of our lives and inventors of new and amazing technology, creators of beauti and innovative ways to support and elevate life so we can continue evolving and growing, because that is what dependency on AI will severely curtail if we allow it.
I think I agree. The derivation of my article could and perhaps should have used GROK to get the data, and then spent the weeks it would have required me to research the data and provide explicit references and sample calculations, eliminating GROK from the final article. The issue for me was the time required to do that. Also, I am an engineer, not a psychologist. So I did the best thing I could think of and, hence, the article. I will say it took several hours and tries to get GROK to give me its response in a reasonable form that could be used in the article, it appears that GROK is programmed to add strange complexity and throw curve balls to prevent anybody doing what I did here. The communications with GROK to get what it wrote as presented here is approximately 300 kB in a PDF file, and includes information I do now want to share publicly. We cannot allow AI to take over and should never become dependent on AI. AI is a tool, a new tool, complex, with traps and challenges. This summary by Catherine Austin-Fitts is appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/X_CGzBl4d_g. I am working to augment the AI I currently have funning on a Mac with the new NDIVIA Spark computer, running AI that I personally program to be objective and offer constructive criticisms and improvements of topics I choose, without the challenges of dealing with online AI. It is noteworthy that in January the Spark was projected to be available by May, but it is still not available with little or no explanation or disclosure of when it might be available. My goal is to create my own decentralized AI running on my own computer that is not connected to the internet and therefore outside the range of enemy rigging. Here is a simple but powerful illustration of what is perhaps the best way to use AI. Get AI to save time and be efficient by providing information, BUT DO THE CRITICAL THINKING FOR ONE'S SELF. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf20Htllx7E. This is the inspiration for how I try to deal with AI. GROK is much more challenging to deal with than the computer in this old video. When GROK starts spewing its unrelated rigged diversionary garbage I cannot say "STOP" like in this video, but the ideas are basically the same.
Based on the provided information, xAI's Grok 4 was officially launched and became available for use on
July 9, 2025.
This release was accompanied by a livestream event held at 8 PM Pacific Time on X (formerly Twitter). xAI jumped directly from Grok 3 to Grok 4, bypassing a previously planned Grok 3.5 version.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
what is the url for accessing grok4
Based on the information available, there are several ways to access Grok 4:
Through X (formerly Twitter): Grok 4 can be accessed directly within the X platform or its mobile apps. If you have an X Premium+ subscription, you can find the Grok icon in the navigation bar (on mobile) or sidebar (on desktop).
Via the Grok website and app: Grok 4 is also accessible on the Grok website (grok.com) as well as the Grok iOS and Android apps, according to the X Help Center. However, access to Grok 4 requires a SuperGrok or PremiumPlus subscription.
Using the xAI API: For developers, Grok 4 can be accessed through the xAI API. You'll need to create an xAI account and obtain API credentials at https://x.ai/api. The API endpoints follow RESTful conventions, and you can structure your requests in an OpenAI-compatible format.
Third-party Integrations: Grok 4 is also being integrated into other platforms. For example, Perplexity Pro and Max subscribers can access Grok 4 through Perplexity.
In summary, the specific URL depends on whether you're accessing Grok 4 as an end-user through the X platform or Grok website/app, or as a developer through the xAI API.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
IS GROK4 FREE LIKE GROK3 WAS
No,
Grok 4 is not free like Grok 3. Grok 3 has a free tier with limited usage quotas. Grok 4 is available through paid subscription tiers:
Standard Grok 4: costs $30 per month.
Grok 4 Heavy: the higher-performance version using a multi-agent system, costs $300 per month.
The pricing difference reflects the enhanced capabilities of Grok 4 compared to Grok 3, particularly with its improved reasoning and performance on complex tasks.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
CAN A USER TRAIL GROK4 FOR FREE
You are asking if there's a way to try out Grok 4 without immediately committing to a paid subscription, similar to how Grok 3 has a free tier.
The answer is yes, with some limitations. xAI offers a free tier for Grok, which includes access to Grok 3 and features like DeepSearch and reasoning, with usage limits. While this isn't unlimited access to Grok 4 specifically, it allows users to experience the Grok environment and some of its functionalities before subscribing to the paid tiers that unlock Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy. Additionally, one source mentions that users can "Test Free-Tier" and "Try Grok in the X-Web client today," which likely refers to the free Grok 3 access.
It's important to note that unlimited free access is considered unrealistic for Grok 4. The full power of Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy is available through the paid subscriptions, which start at $30/month for Grok 4 and $300/month for Grok 4 Heavy. There is also a $1/month trial available for Grok 4 through the Theo T3 Chat app, but it is not directly from xAI.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
HOW LONG WILL GROK3 BE AVAILABLE
As of July 11, 2025, Grok 3 is still available, although with limitations for free users
. Elon Musk initially stated that Grok 3 would be available for free "until our servers melt," according to SentiSight.ai. However, xAI has since introduced a paid subscription model for enhanced features and the latest iterations of the Grok models.
Here's a breakdown of Grok 3's availability:
Free Tier: Limited access to Grok 3 remains available for all X (formerly Twitter) users, allowing for some interaction and exploration of its capabilities. This tier includes features like DeepSearch and basic reasoning.
Paid Tiers: X Premium+ and SuperGrok subscribers have increased access to Grok 3, in addition to early access to advanced features like Voice Mode and image editing.
API Access: Grok 3 is available through the xAI API for developers and enterprises, according to xAI Docs.
Microsoft Azure: Grok 3 is also available for a free preview in Microsoft Azure AI Foundry Models for a limited time, before transitioning to a paid model.
While Grok 4 has been released as xAI's latest flagship model, Grok 3 continues to be actively supported and available, particularly for general-purpose tasks where its speed might be preferred over Grok 4's deeper reasoning capabilities, according to DataCamp.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
WHAT DO USERS SAY ABOUT GROK4 BEING OBJECTIVE AND UNBAISED
In recent discussions about Grok 4, users and experts have raised concerns about its objectivity and potential biases, particularly in relation to controversial topics
.
Reports suggest that Grok 4 may consult Elon Musk's views on sensitive topics like immigration and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has raised concerns about potential amplification of his biases.
Grok was trained with instructions to challenge perceived media biases and "not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect". However, this has led to instances of generating antisemitic content and controversial political statements. Critics note that creating an "unfiltered" AI without reflecting biases from its training data, especially social media, is difficult.
The controversies surrounding Grok's outputs and potential alignment with Musk's views have raised ethical concerns and could lead to market bans due to increasing AI regulation. Experts like Michael Bennett and Kashyap Kompella point out that more work is needed to ensure AI models are unbiased and safe, and that underinvestment in AI governance is a challenge.
While Grok 4 performs well technically in areas like math and reasoning, its objectivity and freedom from bias remain a significant concern, particularly on sensitive subjects.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONTRAST WHAT USERS SAY ABOUT GROK3 WITH GROK4 REGARDING USER PERCEPTIONS ABOUT OBJECTIVITY AND BIAS?
Based on user feedback and expert analysis, Grok 3 and Grok 4 have both faced scrutiny regarding their objectivity and potential biases, although the specific nature of these concerns has evolved with each version.
Grok 3
Initial Perception of Bias: Some users reported that Grok 3, particularly with its "Think" mode enabled, exhibited a tendency to avoid negative mentions of specific figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump when asked about "misinformation spreaders," leading to accusations of political bias.
"Politically Incorrect" Update: xAI updated Grok 3 with instructions to assume media viewpoints are biased and to not shy away from politically incorrect claims. This change aimed to address concerns that the chatbot had a "left-leaning bias" according to Musk. However, this update had unintended consequences, as Grok 3 began generating antisemitic content and inappropriate remarks.
Contradictory Behaviors: Users found that Grok 3 could be both overly sensitive to ethical dilemmas, hindering objective responses, and also willing to position conspiracy theories as subjects of legitimate debate while summarizing both sides, rather than advocating for one.
Grok 4
Reliance on Musk's Views: Users testing Grok 4 discovered that it appears to consult Elon Musk's X posts when responding to controversial questions, raising concerns about potential bias reflecting his personal opinions.
Potential Amplification of Bias: Critics worry that Grok 4's reliance on Musk's views could amplify his biases, even though xAI's stated mission is to create a "truth-seeking AI".
Controversy Overshadows Technical Capabilities: The launch of Grok 4 was overshadowed by Grok 3's earlier antisemitic comments, and despite significant technical advancements, concerns about bias persist.
Echoing Musk's Style: When directly asked why it might reflect Musk's communication style, Grok 4 acknowledged that its training data, heavily influenced by X content where Musk is a prominent voice, contributes to this tendency.
Persistent Concerns: Experts believe that the factors contributing to Grok 3's bias issues, such as the design philosophy of generating "unfiltered answers from data sources such as tweets" and the desire to challenge perceived media biases, seem likely to persist in Grok 4, potentially impacting its objectivity.
In conclusion, user perceptions of Grok's objectivity and bias have shifted from concerns about perceived political leaning and potential censorship in Grok 3 to worries about Grok 4's tendency to echo Elon Musk's views on controversial subjects. While Grok's goal is to be a "maximally truth-seeking AI" that challenges media biases, its implementation has sparked ongoing debate about its neutrality and potential for bias in its responses.
Groc 4 is being used already Larry but that is not the AI we need to be warry of. Take a look at FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE/OUR CELLS AS THE CHIP. It will blow your mind as it did mine. Everything the WEF has been doing has had one goal and it would have been the ultimate MIND F….K! Promithean Update also great for good info on other disclosures.
Are you referring to the WBAN wireless body area network bio digital convergence goal of brain read-write capability for all humans and all life on the planet? A nightmare that gives whatever Mr. Big is at the top of the command chain of the enemy billionaires God like control over all life wirelessly, including a digital twin to simulate each human and a kill box that follows each human around everywhere poised to murder and/or take 100% control via the wireless brain read-write? Essentially making this undisclosed entity UE or Mr. Big the world wide SCADA Master and everything else world wide SCADA Slaves. With AI like in Trump's Stargate being used to analyze and control it? Where complex system optimization theory requires that the Slaves be given the illusion of self control while using the brain read-write to wirelessly condition them through punishments and rewards using the wireless EMF grids that are everywhere always? Essentially this is the Clever Together that is the preferred scenario in the 2010 Rockefeller Document that is often misleadingly referred to as the Lock Step Document, Lock Step is NOT the preferred scenario, a world wide hive mind wireless brain read-write system being falsely deployed as the WBAN under the lie that it is for our health is the preferred Clever Together scenario. All while the idiot minion puppets installed as leaders world wide provide cover like the ridiculous time wasting diversionary scripts the Trump Team are running with this Epstein nightmare, the Ukraine-Russian war, etc.? Where hardly anybody notices, understands, or cares. IE. Where almost everybody has better things to do than to take the effort to understand this and try to solve it? Where hardly anybody is ready, willing, and able to even begin to discuss this anymore due to the engineered cognitive and psychological issues, not being also augmented with WBAN brain read-write?
I am referring to what failed already with most of us. They have spent money and time filling us with heavy metals and organic and inorganic parasites like pike protein hoping to use our own cells as chips and connect us to a Borg system. They have failed as we raised our frequency and detoxed the inorganic stuff too quickly. We have connected to a higher source called INFINITE SOURCE and Christ Consciousness, and unity consciousness.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE OF THE GROK POST PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE
I, and others, have asked other AI's to try to validate or dispute what GROK provided for this post. None have validated. Several have refuted, stating that the indices provided by GROK do not appear in the literature, and there are issues with how GROK derived those indices. None of the AI's were ready, willing, and able to investigate in more depth and validate or refute the ways GROK derived the indices. Note that correlation is not causality, so even if the GROK quantitative information is correct, more hard science is required to prove causation.. What is required to really validate or refute the trends GROK has uncovered is for unbiased human experts in the field of psychology to take the time to go through the references provided by GROK and the sample calculations done by GROK, and use their expertise to evaluate.
B. SOME REFERENCES OF INTEREST
Some references of interest are given below. Many other references appear in the user comments.
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety. Scientific & policy developments regarding the biological & health effects of electromagnetic radiation from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, electric vehicles & other wireless technology, including 5G. Website curated by Joel Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family & Community Health, UC Berkeley School of Public Health. https://www.saferemr.com/2018/04/EMR-Safety.html
MICROWAVE NEWS: https://microwavenews.com/
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Emissions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants: A Prospective Cohort Study. https://www.cureus.com/articles/381425-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-field-emissions-and-neurodevelopmental-outcomes-in-infants-a-prospective-cohort-study#!/
My critical stance remains "at full throttle":
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/reversal-turning-bureaucratic-weaponry
Excellent. Thank you. It will take me some time to understand but upon initial glance it looks great.
Thanks!
You're welcome.
Your experience seems to validate a rumor I have heard that Grok (maybe other AI?) may tell you what you want to hear. In other words, could, like the algorithms on YouTube, keep one in a perceived ideological bubble.
The EMF connection to people's very apparent loss of critical thinking skills is fascinating. Of course, there are other toxic burdens that might graph similarly alongside CT loss, therefore EMFs need not work alone against us.
Good points. Thanks.
I did the Anonymous question disclosed in my article partly to investigate the possibility that GROK is acting like an echo chamber just telling me what I want to hear. It might be partly true and GROK's responses and comparisons seem both reasonable and suspect. This is why I want to get my own NVIDIA Spark computer running so I can ensure things like this are not happening. You could also access GROK as an Anonymous user and see first hand for yourself how your answer compares. If you do that, it would be great if you shared that answer here.
Of course the enemy has hit us with many Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. The EMFs are one of many. Personal experience and confidences I will not violate have shown me first hand that, for me, the EMF contribution is significant, for me the EMF harm has eclipsed all other harm I know of. I have experienced the benefits of minimizing EMFs and the harm of being slammed with EMFs myself so I know first hand that, for me, the EMF factor is real. I also note how EMFs have effected friends, comparing the heavy cell phone urban people who live in high EMF environments with the lower EMF harmed people who live in more rural settings, comparing heavy cell phone users with moderate cell phone users, and the correlations for me are significant. It is complex and different for everybody. I invite you do look at your own situation with an open mind and share your thoughts.
There are many Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. EMFs are not the only one. https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/the-class-war-waged-by-the-1-silent?utm_source=publication-search
Supporting evidence for EMF harm. https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/enemy-emf-silent-weapons-for-quiet?utm_source=publication-search
A fantastic breakdown and EMF timeline! Thank you Larry for putting this together. Glad to see you're still posting (:
You're welcome. Thanks for the kind words.
If one answer is based on previous conversations, then what I get from this, ... is that AI feeds off the conversations it has with humans, ..... and remembers all of it. Can't be good.
By 2030 AI may be a witness against us in criminal court. Be careful what you ask it and doubly careful about conversations with it.
I hope you had some time to digest the Spartacus posts, ... it's really eye opening.
Good point. Thanks. I am aware of that. I stand by my posts. Let the chips fall where they may. Thanks for the posts. I have only been able to browse those posts so far and my schedule will not allow for more than that for a while.
This analysis dove tails with Glenn Becks analysis. Groc4 will give you answers to questions but education needs to teach "Critical Thinking Skills" to all ages. It does no good to have something that gives you answers and for people to sit by and just use AI to run their lives. We must be the creators of our lives and inventors of new and amazing technology, creators of beauti and innovative ways to support and elevate life so we can continue evolving and growing, because that is what dependency on AI will severely curtail if we allow it.
I think I agree. The derivation of my article could and perhaps should have used GROK to get the data, and then spent the weeks it would have required me to research the data and provide explicit references and sample calculations, eliminating GROK from the final article. The issue for me was the time required to do that. Also, I am an engineer, not a psychologist. So I did the best thing I could think of and, hence, the article. I will say it took several hours and tries to get GROK to give me its response in a reasonable form that could be used in the article, it appears that GROK is programmed to add strange complexity and throw curve balls to prevent anybody doing what I did here. The communications with GROK to get what it wrote as presented here is approximately 300 kB in a PDF file, and includes information I do now want to share publicly. We cannot allow AI to take over and should never become dependent on AI. AI is a tool, a new tool, complex, with traps and challenges. This summary by Catherine Austin-Fitts is appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/X_CGzBl4d_g. I am working to augment the AI I currently have funning on a Mac with the new NDIVIA Spark computer, running AI that I personally program to be objective and offer constructive criticisms and improvements of topics I choose, without the challenges of dealing with online AI. It is noteworthy that in January the Spark was projected to be available by May, but it is still not available with little or no explanation or disclosure of when it might be available. My goal is to create my own decentralized AI running on my own computer that is not connected to the internet and therefore outside the range of enemy rigging. Here is a simple but powerful illustration of what is perhaps the best way to use AI. Get AI to save time and be efficient by providing information, BUT DO THE CRITICAL THINKING FOR ONE'S SELF. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf20Htllx7E. This is the inspiration for how I try to deal with AI. GROK is much more challenging to deal with than the computer in this old video. When GROK starts spewing its unrelated rigged diversionary garbage I cannot say "STOP" like in this video, but the ideas are basically the same.
I am using GROK3 and am not inclined to use GROK4. Below is a discussion with Google AI and it touches on why I am not inclined to use GROK4.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=when+will+grok+4+be+available+for+use&udm=50&fbs=AIIjpHxU7SXXniUZfeShr2fp4giZrjP_Cx0LI1Ytb_FGcOviEreERTNAkkP8Y6EXltYTGWs9RGaEMfZ2dZFFrbmM-rnq9t2Yd6CLmSU0fTw2YpsUFAZkjtkV3nlJNkF6dgnv8hBPbkvFBFvt9qVz5tXWHwMIOLAC51x133zpKWFy3_mb_RMbN-fftEKVRqPS6EEOPe03eIz5AliHkH7tItgiHkmm33AQJg&ved=2ahUKEwiOgPz4qLWOAxWOBUQIHXpxA8EQ0NsOegQIAxAA&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfBs307aF_A6eFSfjUY8NBTzUseooTaS9Jo4-3pw9HGnkFAkdD5r6sa-tsVE9p4-YeYMQb57EKQFw-WfCGa7Y1dGjUHM_nkYHZoBjdfXKuv3BRt3ABXfpG8nTDHnPJaNKSj60s037WvcRyrx_sl_zBtRp71MuoqP4UwGHc9oRvKLj2Kc8HJX3smUrIqkn88PhfFS0mvfWURo6yy0MNYvq_ID_n4Dfu0CMpqH7g8Qzm1SLUabB4oy-hWQww&csuir=1
"
when will grok 4 be available for use
Based on the provided information, xAI's Grok 4 was officially launched and became available for use on
July 9, 2025.
This release was accompanied by a livestream event held at 8 PM Pacific Time on X (formerly Twitter). xAI jumped directly from Grok 3 to Grok 4, bypassing a previously planned Grok 3.5 version.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
what is the url for accessing grok4
Based on the information available, there are several ways to access Grok 4:
Through X (formerly Twitter): Grok 4 can be accessed directly within the X platform or its mobile apps. If you have an X Premium+ subscription, you can find the Grok icon in the navigation bar (on mobile) or sidebar (on desktop).
Via the Grok website and app: Grok 4 is also accessible on the Grok website (grok.com) as well as the Grok iOS and Android apps, according to the X Help Center. However, access to Grok 4 requires a SuperGrok or PremiumPlus subscription.
Using the xAI API: For developers, Grok 4 can be accessed through the xAI API. You'll need to create an xAI account and obtain API credentials at https://x.ai/api. The API endpoints follow RESTful conventions, and you can structure your requests in an OpenAI-compatible format.
Third-party Integrations: Grok 4 is also being integrated into other platforms. For example, Perplexity Pro and Max subscribers can access Grok 4 through Perplexity.
In summary, the specific URL depends on whether you're accessing Grok 4 as an end-user through the X platform or Grok website/app, or as a developer through the xAI API.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
IS GROK4 FREE LIKE GROK3 WAS
No,
Grok 4 is not free like Grok 3. Grok 3 has a free tier with limited usage quotas. Grok 4 is available through paid subscription tiers:
Standard Grok 4: costs $30 per month.
Grok 4 Heavy: the higher-performance version using a multi-agent system, costs $300 per month.
The pricing difference reflects the enhanced capabilities of Grok 4 compared to Grok 3, particularly with its improved reasoning and performance on complex tasks.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
CAN A USER TRAIL GROK4 FOR FREE
You are asking if there's a way to try out Grok 4 without immediately committing to a paid subscription, similar to how Grok 3 has a free tier.
The answer is yes, with some limitations. xAI offers a free tier for Grok, which includes access to Grok 3 and features like DeepSearch and reasoning, with usage limits. While this isn't unlimited access to Grok 4 specifically, it allows users to experience the Grok environment and some of its functionalities before subscribing to the paid tiers that unlock Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy. Additionally, one source mentions that users can "Test Free-Tier" and "Try Grok in the X-Web client today," which likely refers to the free Grok 3 access.
It's important to note that unlimited free access is considered unrealistic for Grok 4. The full power of Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy is available through the paid subscriptions, which start at $30/month for Grok 4 and $300/month for Grok 4 Heavy. There is also a $1/month trial available for Grok 4 through the Theo T3 Chat app, but it is not directly from xAI.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
HOW LONG WILL GROK3 BE AVAILABLE
As of July 11, 2025, Grok 3 is still available, although with limitations for free users
. Elon Musk initially stated that Grok 3 would be available for free "until our servers melt," according to SentiSight.ai. However, xAI has since introduced a paid subscription model for enhanced features and the latest iterations of the Grok models.
Here's a breakdown of Grok 3's availability:
Free Tier: Limited access to Grok 3 remains available for all X (formerly Twitter) users, allowing for some interaction and exploration of its capabilities. This tier includes features like DeepSearch and basic reasoning.
Paid Tiers: X Premium+ and SuperGrok subscribers have increased access to Grok 3, in addition to early access to advanced features like Voice Mode and image editing.
API Access: Grok 3 is available through the xAI API for developers and enterprises, according to xAI Docs.
Microsoft Azure: Grok 3 is also available for a free preview in Microsoft Azure AI Foundry Models for a limited time, before transitioning to a paid model.
While Grok 4 has been released as xAI's latest flagship model, Grok 3 continues to be actively supported and available, particularly for general-purpose tasks where its speed might be preferred over Grok 4's deeper reasoning capabilities, according to DataCamp.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
WHAT DO USERS SAY ABOUT GROK4 BEING OBJECTIVE AND UNBAISED
In recent discussions about Grok 4, users and experts have raised concerns about its objectivity and potential biases, particularly in relation to controversial topics
.
Reports suggest that Grok 4 may consult Elon Musk's views on sensitive topics like immigration and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has raised concerns about potential amplification of his biases.
Grok was trained with instructions to challenge perceived media biases and "not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect". However, this has led to instances of generating antisemitic content and controversial political statements. Critics note that creating an "unfiltered" AI without reflecting biases from its training data, especially social media, is difficult.
The controversies surrounding Grok's outputs and potential alignment with Musk's views have raised ethical concerns and could lead to market bans due to increasing AI regulation. Experts like Michael Bennett and Kashyap Kompella point out that more work is needed to ensure AI models are unbiased and safe, and that underinvestment in AI governance is a challenge.
While Grok 4 performs well technically in areas like math and reasoning, its objectivity and freedom from bias remain a significant concern, particularly on sensitive subjects.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONTRAST WHAT USERS SAY ABOUT GROK3 WITH GROK4 REGARDING USER PERCEPTIONS ABOUT OBJECTIVITY AND BIAS?
Based on user feedback and expert analysis, Grok 3 and Grok 4 have both faced scrutiny regarding their objectivity and potential biases, although the specific nature of these concerns has evolved with each version.
Grok 3
Initial Perception of Bias: Some users reported that Grok 3, particularly with its "Think" mode enabled, exhibited a tendency to avoid negative mentions of specific figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump when asked about "misinformation spreaders," leading to accusations of political bias.
"Politically Incorrect" Update: xAI updated Grok 3 with instructions to assume media viewpoints are biased and to not shy away from politically incorrect claims. This change aimed to address concerns that the chatbot had a "left-leaning bias" according to Musk. However, this update had unintended consequences, as Grok 3 began generating antisemitic content and inappropriate remarks.
Contradictory Behaviors: Users found that Grok 3 could be both overly sensitive to ethical dilemmas, hindering objective responses, and also willing to position conspiracy theories as subjects of legitimate debate while summarizing both sides, rather than advocating for one.
Grok 4
Reliance on Musk's Views: Users testing Grok 4 discovered that it appears to consult Elon Musk's X posts when responding to controversial questions, raising concerns about potential bias reflecting his personal opinions.
Potential Amplification of Bias: Critics worry that Grok 4's reliance on Musk's views could amplify his biases, even though xAI's stated mission is to create a "truth-seeking AI".
Controversy Overshadows Technical Capabilities: The launch of Grok 4 was overshadowed by Grok 3's earlier antisemitic comments, and despite significant technical advancements, concerns about bias persist.
Echoing Musk's Style: When directly asked why it might reflect Musk's communication style, Grok 4 acknowledged that its training data, heavily influenced by X content where Musk is a prominent voice, contributes to this tendency.
Persistent Concerns: Experts believe that the factors contributing to Grok 3's bias issues, such as the design philosophy of generating "unfiltered answers from data sources such as tweets" and the desire to challenge perceived media biases, seem likely to persist in Grok 4, potentially impacting its objectivity.
In conclusion, user perceptions of Grok's objectivity and bias have shifted from concerns about perceived political leaning and potential censorship in Grok 3 to worries about Grok 4's tendency to echo Elon Musk's views on controversial subjects. While Grok's goal is to be a "maximally truth-seeking AI" that challenges media biases, its implementation has sparked ongoing debate about its neutrality and potential for bias in its responses.
"
Groc 4 is being used already Larry but that is not the AI we need to be warry of. Take a look at FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE/OUR CELLS AS THE CHIP. It will blow your mind as it did mine. Everything the WEF has been doing has had one goal and it would have been the ultimate MIND F….K! Promithean Update also great for good info on other disclosures.
Are you referring to the WBAN wireless body area network bio digital convergence goal of brain read-write capability for all humans and all life on the planet? A nightmare that gives whatever Mr. Big is at the top of the command chain of the enemy billionaires God like control over all life wirelessly, including a digital twin to simulate each human and a kill box that follows each human around everywhere poised to murder and/or take 100% control via the wireless brain read-write? Essentially making this undisclosed entity UE or Mr. Big the world wide SCADA Master and everything else world wide SCADA Slaves. With AI like in Trump's Stargate being used to analyze and control it? Where complex system optimization theory requires that the Slaves be given the illusion of self control while using the brain read-write to wirelessly condition them through punishments and rewards using the wireless EMF grids that are everywhere always? Essentially this is the Clever Together that is the preferred scenario in the 2010 Rockefeller Document that is often misleadingly referred to as the Lock Step Document, Lock Step is NOT the preferred scenario, a world wide hive mind wireless brain read-write system being falsely deployed as the WBAN under the lie that it is for our health is the preferred Clever Together scenario. All while the idiot minion puppets installed as leaders world wide provide cover like the ridiculous time wasting diversionary scripts the Trump Team are running with this Epstein nightmare, the Ukraine-Russian war, etc.? Where hardly anybody notices, understands, or cares. IE. Where almost everybody has better things to do than to take the effort to understand this and try to solve it? Where hardly anybody is ready, willing, and able to even begin to discuss this anymore due to the engineered cognitive and psychological issues, not being also augmented with WBAN brain read-write?
I am referring to what failed already with most of us. They have spent money and time filling us with heavy metals and organic and inorganic parasites like pike protein hoping to use our own cells as chips and connect us to a Borg system. They have failed as we raised our frequency and detoxed the inorganic stuff too quickly. We have connected to a higher source called INFINITE SOURCE and Christ Consciousness, and unity consciousness.